My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_2002-01-23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_2002-01-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2024 2:53:36 PM
Creation date
6/21/2024 1:23:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
forward or with the state bonding bill coming up, there might be <br />opportunities to get outside funding. <br />Kroeger asked if it would in our best interest to see how Roseville <br />administers and controls the area. He recommends that everyone in the <br />Commission check it out and observe. <br />Szczepanski asked if we should go ahead and recommend something. <br />Kroeger suggested that we look for location options. <br />Coughlin stated that the Commission should take action to inform the City <br />Administrator of our intent to pursue without a full recommendation perse, <br />recognizing that the Commission will be forthcoming with a <br />recommendation. This will make her aware of our intent in case there are <br />available funds that can be tapped into and expedite the project. <br />Coughlin made the motion to inform the City Administrator of the <br />Commissions intent to pursue further research on a skate park and move <br />forward with it in time. And to also go on site and visit the parks. <br />2nd by Kroeger <br />Motion unanimously passed. <br />Item 3d) Discussion of the building inspector's report on the condition of the <br />existing park buildings. <br />Dazenski stated that he has had no feed back at all from the building <br />inspector. <br />Coughlin noted that Dazenski had said earlier that the Parks Department <br />had given the buildings an overview. <br />Dazenski replied that yes they have done some obvious repairs. <br />Kroeger asked if it was still desirable to have the building inspector review <br />the buildings. <br />Coughlin stated that he thought it would be a good idea on annual basis. <br />Kroeger thought this would be good information for the Park and <br />Recreation Commission in justifying making future recommendations to <br />the Council. <br />Coughlin said he would recommend to have the annual checks done in the <br />spring. <br />Dazenski stated that Groveland Park is becoming bad and needs major <br />repairs; you just can't put siding on the building to make it nice, it has <br />many more problems. <br />Coughlin asked Dazenski to coordinate a spring time assessment of the <br />buildings. <br />Lee asked if the playground equipment, parking lots and lighting should <br />be assessed at the same time. <br />Coughlin stated by insurance standards the equipment must be annually <br />inspected. He agreed that it would be beneficial to take inventory of the <br />areas regarding the other issues. <br />Szczepanski thought a comprehensive report would be beneficial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.