Laserfiche WebLink
said he didn't think it was a problem. 3rd property owner thought it was a great idea. <br />Gunn stated that the Commission will need to make a decision on what area we want to <br />dedicate as a skate park and then proceed to talk with the affected property owners. <br />Kroeger said that the Groveland site has pad, fencing and is highly visible. Community <br />Center area will cost more because of the needed pad and fencing but it is located well. <br />Lee suggested listing the 3 proposed sites along with pro's/con's of each. Kroeger also <br />suggested SilverView Park. Gunn said that SilverView has no visibility. Could also <br />utilize Hillview Park for a skate park in the summer and dismantle in the winter. Gunn <br />how long does the Commission want to stretch this out? Must be part of budget process <br />for 2003. Suggest $55,000 in case we have to do some paving and fencing work. <br />Kroeger suggested listing pro's/con's of the 5 sites (Groveland, Greenfield, Community <br />Center, SilverView, Hillview) and email them to Lee by the week of August 5. Also can <br />add the survey questions. Lee will put this recommendation in for the 2003 budget and <br />the Commission can continue with research on the skate park. Gunn said to email Lee by <br />August 8, 2002 your pro's/con's of each of the proposed skate park sites and list your <br />survey questions. <br />No official motion was made, nor 2°d. <br />New Business <br />Kroeger asked if there was anything new regarding Spring Lake? Lee stated that he <br />hasn't heard anything for the past 3 mos. <br />Kroeger asked if it would be possible to put the pictures of the skate parks toured on the <br />City's web site? Lee will talk to Ericson. <br />The next meeting will be August 22, 2002 at 6:30pm. This meeting will be dedicated to <br />the community survey questions. <br />Gunn motioned to adjourn. <br />2„ d: <br />Motion unanimously passed <br />