My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMMISSION_MINUTES_2003-03-20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
COMMISSION_MINUTES_2003-03-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2024 2:55:55 PM
Creation date
6/24/2024 1:10:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sonterre also suggested that the excess or surplus could be put back into the park <br />dedication fund or put the money towards an inspector that will be inspecting all of the <br />parks and shelters. <br />Kroeger asked the commission for their opinion. <br />Silvis agreed with the asphalt placement for the basketball hoops. <br />Kroeger thought the proposal to the council could recognize that the City is losing a <br />basketball court and may want to address in the future the need to replace it. <br />Dazenski stated that Greenfield Park would be the best choice. <br />Krueger added to the proposal that the City is losing two'/2 court basketball courts and <br />the commission will probably be pursuing replacing them elsewhere in Mounds View. <br />Sonterre stated to also dedicate any surplus at that time of the proposal to the council. <br />Kunz moved that any surplus funds after the infrastructure and equipment purchases of a <br />skate park be set aside for the relocating of the basketball hoops removed from the <br />Community Center to another park in Mounds View. (The park location will be <br />determined later.) <br />Kroeger 2nd the motion. <br />Discussion: <br />Edmond stated he doesn't see any reason why the hoops could not sit idle for a while. <br />Kroeger reiterated that there is a lot of interest in the skate park by the community. But, <br />he also has concerns regarding the existing conditions of the parks. Two shelter buildings <br />need to be addressed and he is concerned about spending this money at this time on a <br />skate park. <br />Mendoza expressed that he has reservations about making a decision now. He doesn't <br />know enough information on the conditions of the parks, etc. to make a decision on a <br />skate park. <br />Kroeger stated that the commission should now take a vote on the motion presented. <br />Mendoza: Abstained <br />Silvis: Aye <br />Kroeger: Nay <br />Kunz: Aye <br />Edmond: Nay <br />Kroeger stated that he would like to see existing buildings taken care of. Need an <br />inspector to evaluate the buildings. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.