My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dale Aukee's Input - November 2, 2006 - Comments Regarding T-Mobile proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-16-2006
>
Dale Aukee's Input - November 2, 2006 - Comments Regarding T-Mobile proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2023 3:02:46 PM
Creation date
8/21/2024 3:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
$500/month for ground space. You can still require T-Mobile to pay a portion of the rent in addition to <br />whatever ground rent you get from co-locators; <br />2) Lease more space to T-Mobile than they currently require and allow them to sublease some of that space to <br />other carriers. Then, take a percentage (50% seems to be common) of the rent from T-Mobile. Currently, <br />rents for co-location are around $1,200 - $2,100/month. NOTE: Carriers usually don’t agree to split co- <br />location rent but, they will often do it with local governments. Additionally, they build monopoles on city <br />property knowing that they may never be able to recoup any of their costs through co-location fees; or, <br />3) Allow T-Mobile to build the tower, convey it to the City and abate their rent for an agreed upon number of <br />years. Then, charge any additional carriers rent for tower and ground space. <br />Any combinations of the above may be an option. <br /> <br />Some things carriers won’t negotiate on are: <br />A) Access to the site – they usually need 24 hr/7 days a week access in the event the site goes down. This will be a large <br />burden if future park uses change. <br />B) Sharing a percentage of their revenue – other than co-location rent. This becomes difficult calculation. <br /> <br />Again if the City is to move forward these are possibilities to get the City the best deal. <br /> <br />Dale Aukee <br />Field Representative <br />Great River Energy <br />Office 763-241-2229 <br />Cell 612-840-4019 <br />Fax 763-241-6003 <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Greg Lee \[mailto:greg.lee@ci.mounds-view.mn.us\] <br />Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 8:18 AM <br />To: Cindy Palm; Aukee, Dale GRE/ER; Dan Weldon; Dave Long (E-mail); Gerald Arel (E-mail); Jerome Kunz (E- <br />mail); John Kroeger (E-mail); John Kroeger -work; Marta McIntyre; Shari Kunza; Steve Dazenski <br />Cc: Kari Brown <br />Subject: T-Mobile proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park - draft report <br /> <br />Hi Commissioners and Kari, <br />Attached is the draft report pertaining to the proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park. This <br />item has been placed on the November 6th Work Session Agenda. <br />At this meeting a representative of T-Mobile will be available to present the proposal and answer any questions <br />the City Council may have. <br />Is there any additional information or points that you wish to be included in this report? <br />Please let me know as soon as possible. <br />Greg <br /><<T-Mobile Pole and Antenna Installation Proposal at Groveland Park 11-6-2006.doc>> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.