My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Dale Aukee's Input - November 8, 2006 RE T-Mobile proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-16-2006
>
Dale Aukee's Input - November 8, 2006 RE T-Mobile proposed communication pole and antenna at Groveland Park
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2023 3:02:46 PM
Creation date
8/21/2024 3:03:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />* With respect to additional carriers or co-locating, there are <br />three ways the City may want to consider leasing: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1) Lease to T-Mobile only that space they need for their 10' x 12' <br />shelter and then lease additional ground space to other carriers if, and when, they go on the tower. Other, co-locating <br />carriers will have to pay T-Mobile approximately $1,000/month just for use of the monopole so, they will balk at paying <br />more than around $500/month for ground space. <br />You can still require T-Mobile to pay a portion of the rent in addition to whatever ground rent you get from co-locators; <br /> <br />2) Lease more space to T-Mobile than they currently require and <br />allow them to sublease some of that space to other carriers. Then, take a percentage (50% seems to be common) of the <br />rent from T-Mobile. <br />Currently, rents for co-location are around $1,200 - $2,100/month. <br />NOTE: Carriers usually don't agree to split co-location rent but, they will often do it with local governments. <br />Additionally, they build monopoles on city property knowing that they may never be able to recoup any of their costs <br />through co-location fees; or, <br /> <br />3) Allow T-Mobile to build the tower, convey it to the City and <br />abate their rent for an agreed upon number of years. Then, charge any additional carriers rent for tower and ground <br />space. <br /> <br />Any combinations of the above may be an option. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Some things carriers won't negotiate on are: <br /> <br />A) Access to the site - they usually need 24 hr/7 days a week access in the event the site goes down. This will be a large <br />burden if future park uses change. <br /> <br />B) Sharing a percentage of their revenue - other than co-location rent. <br />This becomes difficult calculation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Again if the City is to move forward these are possibilities to get the City the best deal. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Dale Aukee <br /> <br />Field Representative <br /> <br />Great River Energy <br /> <br />Office 763-241-2229 <br /> <br />Cell 612-840-4019 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.