My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Skate Park - Minutes from Commission Meetings
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
09-27-2007
>
Skate Park - Minutes from Commission Meetings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2023 8:48:29 AM
Creation date
8/21/2024 3:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Parks, Recreation & Forestry Commission
Documnet Type
Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lee suggested listing the 3 proposed sites along with pro’s/con’s of each. Kroeger also suggested SilverView Park. Gunn said that SilverView has no visibility. Could also utilize Hillview <br /> Park for a skate park in the summer and dismantle in the winter. Gunn how long does the Commission want to stretch this out? Must be part of budget process for 2003. Suggest $55,000 <br /> in case we have to do some paving and fencing work. Kroeger suggested listing pro’s/con’s of the 5 sites (Groveland, Greenfield, Community Center, SilverView, Hillview) and email them <br /> to Lee by the week of August 5. Also can add the survey questions. Lee will put this recommendation in for the 2003 budget and the Commission can continue with research on the skate <br /> park. Gunn said to email Lee by August 8, 2002 your pro’s/con’s of each of the proposed skate park sites and list your survey questions. <br />No official motion was made, nor 2nd. <br /> <br /> <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />September 26, 2002 <br /> <br />Skate Park Project <br />Lee reiterated from the last meeting that there were 5-6 locations that were discussed for the skate park. Commissioners were to list pro’s and con’s of each location and come to the <br /> meeting with this information. Szczepanski said to refer to the handout in the packet. How about the location between City Hall and Water Tower? Lee suggested trying it out at Groveland <br /> or Greenfield Park. No permanent structure alterations would be needed. We can see how it works; is it successful or if there problems with the neighbors, vandalism, etc. Long asked <br /> if it would be a possible to construct another hockey rink; would it be a problem maintaining it? Lee replied that it wouldn’t be a problem, but the money will need to come out of the <br /> park dedication fund. Gunn asked if it’s necessary to spend that amount of money. Lee said by using the Groveland or Greenfield site, a trial run can be made without spending a lot <br /> of money. Kroeger stated that there are a lot of places with good facilities but they are being used and are close to the neighbors. Lee suggested narrowing the sites to 1 or 2 and <br /> then have a neighborhood meeting. Kroeger asked what the criteria should be for narrowing it down? Gunn stated cost. Kroger suggested Hillview and Groveland, both are highly visible. <br /> Greenfield is right on the property lines (tennis courts) and this may be too close to the neighbors. Gunn thought Groveland or Greenfield sites would be the best due to the existing <br /> surfaces. Lee stated that the recommendation to the Council should include that the Park and Recreation Commission will evaluate the site in the fall of 2003 with local residential <br /> input included. Szczepanski suggested having the Police Department patrol the area more. Let’s take a vote from all of the commissioners on which park site to use for the skate park: <br />Gunn Groveland <br />Silvis Groveland <br />Kroeger Hillview <br />Long Groveland <br />Kunz Hillview <br />Szczepanski Groveland
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.