My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2023/12/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
Agenda Packets - 2023/12/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:51:41 PM
Creation date
9/9/2024 9:37:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
12/11/2023
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Packets
Date
12/11/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 27, 2023 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 1 department hired a recruitment individual to assist with bringing 29 new individuals into the <br /> 2 department. He discussed how important this was to the department while it shifts to a duty crew <br /> 3 on January 1, 2024. He commented further on how the fire stations would be staffed in the new <br /> 4 year. He was pleased to report the department took delivery of new fire engine #3, which would <br /> 5 be at the North Station. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Mayor Lindstrom thanked Deputy Chief Grantz for his update and stated he was looking forward <br /> 8 to the Santa Parade. <br /> 9 <br /> to 7. PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Vince Meyer, 8380 Spring Lake Road, stated at the last meeting he asked if needed a permit to <br /> 13 park a dumpster on his road. He explained the police department told him he cannot. He reported <br /> 14 there was a tree removal service on his street today for three hours that locked up traffic and this <br /> 15 past weekend a family had a birthday party with eight visiting cars that were parked in the street. <br /> 16 He anticipated residents on his street would have garage sales this summer. He questioned how <br /> 17 this parking should be addressed and asked if a special permit was required for parking. He <br /> 18 discussed the bad driveways that were found along his roadway and requested the City <br /> 19 communicate better with the residents within this street improvement project. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Sharon Kirscher, 8406 Red Oak Drive, discussed the traffic meeting she was not able to attend. <br /> 22 She indicated she was irritated with the options that were proposed, such as putting a stop sign at <br /> 23 LaPort and Red Oak Drive. She was of the opinion the only way to slow traffic down would be to <br /> 24 put in traffic circles because people were not slowing down for the stop signs. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Nick Super, 8088 Edgewood Drive, explained he has lived in his home for the past three years and <br /> 27 has bene a resident of Mounds View for the past 29 years. He commented on the sales tax <br /> 28 referendum that failed in the last election.He believed that the community center expansion project <br /> 29 was a good project for the City and would have drawn people to the community. He anticipated <br /> 30 the communities negative response was due to the proposed funding. He urged the City Council <br /> 31 to find another funding method to move this project forward without additional taxes on Mounds <br /> 32 View residents. He then asked if the Council was offered any form of compensation from Pulte <br /> 33 Homes or an affiliate in order to support the Ardan Park project. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Mayor Lindstrom and the remainder of the Councilmembers reported they received no <br /> 36 compensation to support this project. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Brian Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, spoke to the Council regarding the proposed 2024 tax <br /> 39 Levy. He reported he received the recent edition of the Mounds View Matters. He explained he was <br /> 40 confused because it appears total revenues and expenditures would be less in 2024, but the City <br /> 41 would be asking for more taxes. He commented on the Charter cap,which was 6% and could only <br /> 42 be raised to 9% if four Councilmembers agreed to raise it to 9%. He feared that the percentage of <br /> 43 increase was more than was spoken about by the Council in September. He understood the amount <br /> 44 that was certified to the County could go down,but could not go up. He urged the Council to work <br /> 45 to lower the proposed tax levy, noting the proposed increase would be a huge burden on hard <br /> 46 working families and seniors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.