My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2024 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2024
>
09-09-2024 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 9:25:00 AM
Creation date
10/29/2024 11:39:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/9/2024
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
Minutes
Date
9/9/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 9, 2024 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> <br />City to continue to provide services that were going to be burdens on the City because of the <br />Medtronic build, like well maintenance and waste management. He noted the funding was not set <br />aside for special expenses. He indicated the Council has chosen to do deficit spending. He reported <br />this was the Council’s budget and it should not be placed on staff to decide how much should be <br />spent. He pointed out the EDA has no taxing authority and then reviewed Statute 469.107, noting <br />the EDA can request a levy and stated this amount should be included in the percentage limit <br />within the Charter. He indicated there was no special street levy that was approved by the voters <br />for street improvements. He explained the proposed levy at 9.13% exceeded the Charter, which <br />meant the levy would have to be placed on the ballot for a referendum vote. <br /> <br />Council Member Meehlhause indicated the fire debt and GO debt would have to be reduced from <br />this percentage. <br /> <br />Mr. Amundsen indicated the Council was still trying to approve a levy that did not meet Charter <br />standards. He stated last year the Council approved a levy increase of 6.5% and this year was <br />proposing an increase of 9%. He encouraged the Council to begin cutting programs especially <br />considering the fact the Council transferred $1.2 million to other funds in 2023. He suggested the <br />Council take a closer look at how to use these funds. He stated he was frustrated by both the budget <br />and tax levy. In addition, he encouraged the Council to support the Charter and the language within <br />the Charter when it comes to levy increases. <br /> <br />Valeria Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, explained when the Charter language was changed to <br />allow for a higher levy limit, the Council vowed to only go to 9% in the event of an emergency. <br />She indicated there was no emergency at this time. She recommended the Council reconsider the <br />budget and tax levy in order to take into the real concerns of older taxpayers in Mounds View. She <br />wanted to see the City Council acting modestly because this was the way the residents in Mounds <br />View lived. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn noted if the fire debt and GO debt were removed from the 9.13% the tax <br />levy would then be reduced to 7.83%. <br /> <br />Rebecca Scholl, 2467 Hillview Road, indicated she owned two properties in Mounds View and <br />taxes were a concern for her. She explained she broke down the taxes for one of her properties and <br />noted the Mounds View portion was $1,200.72. She stated if she applied a factor of 9.14%, she <br />would have an increase from the City of $109.74. She clarified that the proposed 9% increase was <br />only on the City’s portion of taxes and not on residents overall tax bill. She commented further on <br />the cost of cuts, noting this would impact the raises the Council just approved for the Police <br />Department along with the employment status change for Barb Benesch. She discussed how the <br />City had to find a way to balance capital improvements, special projects and the cost of operating <br />a City. She noted the voters have approved levies for additional officers in the community. She <br />understood $68,000 was a lot of money as was $109. She recommended the City provide the public <br />with better information on the proposed levy increase to ensure the City Council was in compliance <br />with the Charter. <br /> <br />Mayor Lindstrom stated in order to remain in compliance with the Charter, the Council would <br />have to approve a levy increase at 9% or less. Finance Director Bauman stated the Council could
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.