Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 12, 2024 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> 1 introduced. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Mayor Lindstrom opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Hearing no public input, Mayor Lindstrom closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 MOTION/SECOND: Meehlhause/Clark. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance <br /> 8 1020, Amending Chapter 33 of the Mounds View City Code Regarding Economic Development <br /> 9 Bylaws. <br /> 10 <br /> 1 1 Ayes—5 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 C. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 1021, Amending the 2025 Fee <br /> 14 Schedule Regarding Water Rates. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 City Administrator Zikmund requested the Council introduce and Ordinance that would amend the <br /> 17 2025 fee schedule regarding water rates. He reviewed the proposed amendment to the water rates <br /> 18 and recommended to ordinance be introduced. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 MOTION/SECOND: Clark/Cermak. To Waive the First Reading and Introduce Ordinance 1021, <br /> 21 Amending the 2025 Fee Schedule Regarding Water Rates. <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Ayes—5 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 D. Resolution 10004, Approving the Proposal from Arko Restoration & <br /> 26 Remodeling for the Public Works Office Remodel. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Public Works/Parks and Recreation Director Peterson requested the Council approve the proposal <br /> 29 from Arko Restoration and Remodeling for remodeling work at the Public Works office. He <br /> 30 explained administrative staff has been added to the Public Works office which would require the <br /> 31 remodeling of the space. He reported staff pursued bids for this project and received two bids. He <br /> 32 indicated a revised bid was submitted by Arko Restoration, which came in as the low bid. He <br /> 33 reported staff would be completing the painting, which would reduce costs slightly. It was noted <br /> 34 this project would be paid for through the Special Projects Fund. Staff recommended the Council <br /> 35 approve the proposal from Arko Restoration. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Council Member Clark asked if the City had to go with the low bidder. Public Works/Parks and <br /> 38 Recreation Director Peterson reported the City did not have to go with the low bidder for this <br /> 39 project. He explained the City does not have experience with Arko,but does have experience with <br /> 4o Rack. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Council Member Clark indicated she would rather move forward with the bid from Rack, given <br /> 43 the fact Arko was not able to provide a bid without errors. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Council Member Gunn stated she supported moving forward with the bid from Arko because they <br /> 46 successfully completed a remodeling project at SBM Fire Station#3. <br />