My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 2:51:22 PM
Creation date
2/25/2025 2:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/6/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in the permitting process should excavation need to take place. The permanent pool storage volume <br />that is needed to meet MPCA recommendations was calculated for Silver View Fond using the <br />impervious area and the direct drainage area of the pond. First, the direct drainage area for the pond <br />was identified by performing a field watershed delineation, Next, the impervious area within (lie <br />drainage area was determined by digitizing impervious area as seen in aerial photographs of the <br />watershed. These values were then used to compute the MPCA recommended design volume for <br />Silver View Pond. <br />2.8 Stormwater Pond Wetland Evaluation <br />If wetland areas are disturbed or altered during pond construction or expansion, wetland permitting <br />and possibly wetland mitigation are required. Therefore, the Silver View Pond area was evaluated to <br />determine its potential to be considered a historic wetland. The area was compared to the National <br />Wetland Inventory (NWI) wetland maps, hydric soils maps, and topographic maps. The wetland type <br />was determined. The pond was also checked to determine if it is listed in the MnDNR Public Waters <br />Inventory. <br />2.9 Stormwater Pond Sediment Coring <br />No sediment coring was completed as a pan of this analysis; however, corings should be completed <br />prior to any pond improvements and the total project cost estimate revisited once a sediment analysis <br />has been performed. Sediment samples should be analyzed for a list of baseline parameters <br />established by the MPCA. Based on the most recent MPCA guidance, "Managing Dredged Materials <br />in the State of Minnesota (December 2011 )," sediment samples from urban stormwater ponds must <br />be analyzed for copper, arsenic, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The historic land use <br />within the drainage area of a stormwater pond should also be reviewed to help determine the <br />reasonable likelihood of other pollutants being present in the sediment. The level of chemical <br />contaminants dictates the disposal method for the excavated sediment. The disposal method required <br />far the sediment is a major factor in determining the cost of sediment removal. The number of <br />sediment cares recommended in the MPCA's guidelines is primarily based on the volume of material <br />to be excavated, if any sediment maintenance is performed. including localized removal at inlets. <br />sediment cores should be obtained to determine the constituents of sediment material. The number of <br />cores needed would be based on the expected sediment removal volume. If the entire volume of <br />accumulated sediment in Silver View Pond were to be removed, at least five cores would be <br />recommended. For planning purposes. it is recommended that the city allocate $4,000 per sediment <br />core to cover the field collection. laboratory testing and reporting costs. This cost estimate is based <br />€'. Mpls'1 MN 62'+F`_'1091 Silver Vine Pond A+srss[nenl Works ilex kepirl tiih'er VICM Pond .hssessntenf-F'inal.d;wx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.