My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
Agenda Packets - 2021/07/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 2:51:22 PM
Creation date
2/25/2025 2:10:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/6/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AOMIN 1000 <br />_43010M * STATE *+iINNESOTA <br />Natural Resources • <br />DEPARTMENT Office /VI @mQl'QR [!n't <br />TO Judy Davidson, DATE: <br />Region VI Waters `1-,kw-,11/13/80 <br />O V 171980 <br />19810, <br />FROM Bob Glazer, REGION V1 PHONE: 464-5200 <br />Ecological Ser ices WATERS <br />ERS <br />SUBJECT: P.A. 80-6258 <br />Lloyd Knudson passed your memorandum of October 28, 1980, <br />dealing with permit application 80-6258 (M & E Development) on <br />to me for comment. <br />I share the opinion with Lloyd that the revised plan, although <br />somewhat modified from the original plan calling for excavation of <br />the entire marsh, is none -the -less still unacceptable as far as the <br />wildlife community is concerned, and from my viewpoint poor as far <br />as maintaining water quality is concerned. <br />As you may recall from our earlier field trip and from my <br />comments to you at that time, the marsh has historically supported <br />a diverse, abundant assortment of fauna and flora. Song birds, <br />waterfowl, shore birds, furbearers small mammals, aquatic insects, <br />and a unique complex of marsh vegetation populate the area. I think <br />that due consideration should be given to the term complex in this <br />discussion for we are dealing with a system, an ecosystem to be <br />correct, and there is an interdependence amongst the plants, animals <br />and their food chains and a relationship to soil types and amounts of <br />standing water that is beautifully demonstrated by the present situation. <br />For instance, the animals draw from many parts of the marsh complex for <br />their life support needs, not just from the floating bog portion nor <br />from the cattail sections alone. To think about converting a sizeable <br />portion of the marsh to open standing water without compensation and not <br />anticipating an upheaval of the present ecological balance would be naive. <br />In response to any argument that creation of open water will simply <br />result in a reshuffling of wildlife types (more ducks for instance), it <br />should be kept in mind that there is already an ample supply of it in <br />the northern suburbs to accomodate duck loafing area needs. It is really <br />the small diverse marsh complexes such as the one under discussion that <br />are in critical supply now in the metropolitan area, and this is presum- <br />ably one of the very reasons the legislature saw the need for wetlands <br />protection in the first place. it should be remembered that the marsh <br />in question is the last remaining marsh of significance in Mounds View <br />that is covered by our wetlands ordinance. <br />cont'd. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.