My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1990/02/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Minutes - 1990/02/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 12:03:33 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 1:39:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/26/1990
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 26, 1990 <br />Regular Meeting Page Three <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />. Paul Mielke, 516 Brighton Lane, stated he is on the <br />Environmental Quality Task Force, and he explained <br />the rational of using enhancement and management, <br />stating they are very important words to use and ar <br />correct. He added the wetlands must be managed. <br />Jim Sandidge, 7817 Bona Road, questioned if there <br />would be a work session for input on this. <br />e <br />Mayor Hankner explained the committee that worked on <br />the update spent many hours going through the ordi- <br />nance, section by section. She added they need to <br />get a list of people who are willing to work on it <br />and spend the amount of time necessary, pointing out <br />is a very big time commitment. <br />City Attorney Meyers explained a good deal of work <br />went into the original ordinance and this revision. <br />He pointed out the City of Mounds View is a leader <br />in the field of preserving setlands. He also noted <br />there had been one lawsuit in Mounds View concerning <br />the wetlands regulations, and several throughout the <br />country, and they can go both ways.. As an attorney, <br />it is his duty to anticipate court challenges, and <br />they have worked hard to establish rational for what <br />the City is trying to do, to make it clear to any <br />court that this issue might come before. He added <br />preservation of the wetlands is not enough, as wet- <br />lands deteriorate, and that must be taken into account. <br />They cannot allow wetland deterioration, and enhance- <br />ment is crucial and has always been in the ordinance. <br />Attorney Meyers advised criteria has been added, con- <br />cerning assessments. The law has changed a great <br />deal, and it is specific on assessments, in that a <br />benefit is required. He added a good deal of time <br />and work has gone into this revision, and he <br />commended the committee for the amount of work they <br />have done. <br />Kathy Ayaz, 7751 Bona Road, stated there is some back <br />patting to do, as a very good job has been done. She <br />noted Andover is working to pattern an ordinance after <br />Mounds View's, and she stated the majority of the <br />update looks good. <br />Mary Go.lke, 5114 Long Lake Road, stated she is concern- <br />ed with the 100' buffer, specifically for residents <br />who were established before the buffer zone was. <br />Attorney Meyers explained that is a very important <br />feature of the wetland ordinance. He added that while <br />that would ultimately be determined by the court, <br />he feels it would be upheld. <br />Ms. Golke stated she would like to see a permit clause <br />added. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.