Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 26, 1990 <br />Regular Meeting Page Five <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />• Councilmember Blanchard stated Mr. Stigney was <br />obviously upset, and she suggested he could perhaps <br />get five or six people together for a committee to <br />look at the issue, and she suggested he could present <br />names to the Council to consider. <br />Mayor Hankner questioned what would be expected of <br />them and what the Council would do with their <br />recommendation. She reviewed the history of the <br />issue, stating the City does not have the option of <br />paying minimum wage for this particular job. She <br />stated the proper body to speak to would be the <br />Department of Employee Relations, not the Attorney <br />General's office. She also stated they had citizen <br />input earlier on in the process, including a resident <br />who is in the human resources field, and that input <br />included salary. She further noted the discussions <br />began in August and occurred in public meetings at <br />City Hall. <br />Mr. Stigney stated a meeting is set for December 3 <br />to review compensation guidelines, and he has looked <br />through copies of all meetings and has not found a <br />recommendation. <br />• Mayor Hankner explained the <br />followed for many years, of <br />sessions, to have them on a <br />added she has long advocate <br />documented but did not have <br />change the procedure. <br />procedure the City has <br />not recording agenda <br />more informal basis. She <br />~ having all meetings <br />the required support to <br />Councilmember Wuori stated she was not willing to make <br />a motion until she has had time to scrutinize the <br />petition. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated she would take it <br />under advisement. <br />Councilmember Paone stated he had not had an opportunity <br />to see it yet. <br />Mr. Stigney. requested a statement from the Council <br />on the petition. <br />Councilmember Wuori stated the signatures would <br />first have to be verified, then they would consider <br />the content of the statement. She added she would <br />be willing to consider the petition at an agenda <br />session, after verification, and would then decide <br />• on any course of action. <br />The Council directed Staff to verify the signatures <br />and get back to the Council at the agenda session. <br />