My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1993/09/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
Minutes - 1993/09/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:28:18 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 1:55:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/13/1993
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ounds View-City Council Page Eighteen <br />~egular Meeting September 13, 1993 <br />Councilmember Trude is opposed to the utility and wants to keep the <br />funding on the property tax. Trude stated she has a problem with <br />making churches and schools pay. Trude stated if the projects are <br />dispersed throughout the City equally, then it is up to the people to <br />decide how it should be funded. Trude is opposed to the churches and <br />schools reducing her rates. If the cost is to benefit the whole city <br />it should go on the property taxes. Trude stated there is a great deal <br />of antagonism towards the proposed new utility fee. Trude stated if <br />the projects are important and critical, then the items should be put <br />into the budget now as part of the upkeep of our streets. <br />McCarty asked if the City were to go with the surface water utility <br />charge how does the City propose to show benefit to the people. <br />Jim Thomson,' City Attorney, stated that the theory behind the surface <br />water management utility is that the City doesn't have to show benefit. <br />McCarty stated that is what is wrong with it, you tax people without <br />showing benefit. <br />Jim Thomson stated that there is a general benefit to the City for <br />implementing the utility. <br />• Mayor Linke stated that the utility is a benefit to the City as a <br />whole. <br />Trude stated that it would be a 6 percent increase from last year's <br />amount of tax to fund all of these projects. Trude suggested perhaps <br />these projects should funded from a combination of sources. <br />Ruth White asked how the whole city would benefit from the Ardan Avenue <br />project which seems to be a conflict of interest with one of our <br />Councilmembers. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the Council is looking at the benefit to the <br />community as a whole rather than a portion of it. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to Adopt Ordinance No. 529, Scenario 2, <br />Establishing a Surface Water Utility and Amending Mounds View Municipal <br />Code by Adding Chapter 73 <br />Trude noticed on that scenario the churches-pay a stiffer fee. Trude <br />questioned if the businessmen have had an opportunity to express their <br />viewpoints. <br />Mayor Linke does not support Scenario #2, because he feels Scenario #1 <br />is treats all properties as though all soils are the same. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.