My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1991/11/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Minutes - 1991/11/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2025 1:16:51 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 2:58:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/25/1991
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~unds View City Council <br />. gular Meeting <br />Page Twelve <br />November 25, 1991 <br />Mark Barney, City Attorney, stated this ordinance would be <br />repealed automatically. Barney further stated to add language <br />regarding public hearing is repeating itself. <br />Mr. Bill Frits asked why the Council was objecting if it <br />doesn't mean anything to not have the language in. <br />Mayor Linke stated with a sunset clause the utility would be <br />dead in 1993 and the whole process would have to be <br />continued to reinstate the utility. <br />Naja Werner, 2765 Sherwood Road, inquired as to if the revenue <br />enhancement measure passes as a utility, her understanding is that it <br />will be a monthly fee of $1.21. Ms. Werner inquired also if this <br />rate would stay the same for the entire three years or if NSP <br />would raise their rates would the fee be changed. <br />Mayor Linke responded that any raise by NSP is built in and <br />covered by the $1.21. <br />William Werner, Sr. stated the Council shouldn't pass this at all <br />. and should forget about the sunset clause. Mr. Werner, Sr., feels <br />the Council should deal with the problem now. <br />Mr. Bill Johnson, 7860 Groveland Road, stated he owns rental <br />property in the form of a four-plex. Mr. Johnson further stated that <br />he pays non-homestead taxes which come out to about $4,000 per <br />year. Mr. Johnson stated the City is adding another additional <br />tax on to the tax roles. Mr. Johnson also stated that rental <br />property is in bad shape these days; his building is deteriorating <br />and he has had to spend much money out of .his own pocket. <br />Mr. Johnson questions who will pay this tax for him. Mr. Johnson <br />stated that if his tenants want more light he installs a light in his <br />parking lot. Mr. Johnson stated he wanted no more taxes. <br />Naja Werner stated that Mounds View has a lot of business parks. <br />Naja Werner wanted to now if they are paying their fair share of <br />the tax burden. Naja Werner also wanted to know if there were <br />special concessions given to businesses to come to Mound View. <br />Mayor Linke responded to Ms. Werner's question with most of the <br />businesses were brought to Mounds View through Tax Increment <br />Financing. Mayor Linke explained that if raw land is worth $1.00 and <br />after the buildings are added it is worth $3.00 in taxes, the <br />additional taxes pay off the bonds. The City gets a percentage <br />of the dollar. Mayor Linke said most of these are set up for <br />fifteen years but ours are way ahead of schedule. What's nice <br />• about this utility is businesses will be paying approximately $5.00 per <br />acre. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.