My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1991/11/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
Minutes - 1991/11/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2025 1:16:51 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 2:58:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/25/1991
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~nds View City Council <br />gular Meeting <br />Page Twenty-One <br />November 25, 1991 <br />Bill Werner, Jr., asked if the Council would be taking public input <br />at the second reading of the ordinance. Would the Council discuss <br />this ordinance the same night as the budget hearing to get a fairly <br />good feeling on the part of the public? <br />Mayor Linke stated that this item will be put out to television and <br />newspapers and the Council is asking people to be there. <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated that there is a theory that people are <br />trained to act in certain ways. If people feel they are not being <br />heard they will not keep coming. The people feel they don't have <br />much impact. Councilmember Rickaby stated that she feels most of the <br />decision making is done at the Work Sessions. <br />Mayor Linke stated that this is the first reconsideration he has ran <br />across in seventeen years. He stated it is the first time it has <br />happened and he was glad it did. <br />Mr. Schwartz asked if the second hearing is approved is this item <br />put back on the docket. <br />• Mayor Linke explained that if this motion passes it would go to <br />a second reading and would need to be carried at the second reading <br />by a 4/5 vote of the City Council. <br />Bill Werner, Jr., asked if this motion passes by a 4/5 majority and <br />goes to second reading and the second reading fails, how long is <br />it dead? Can it be brought back up again? <br />Mayor Linke stated if this motion fails on a 3 to 2 vote, I don't think <br />anyone can bring it back again. If brought back, it would have to be <br />someone from the prevailing side. <br />Councilmember Quick asked if it would be true if this ordinance fails <br />at 4~ could a move to 3.99 be a legitimate motion through second <br />reading process. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the prevailing side could be the only ones <br />to bring it up again. <br />3 ayes 2 nays Motion Failed <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Wuori to approve first reading of Ordinance <br />No. 498 to Implement a Utility Franchise with a 3~ Fee <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated that she dittoed everything she <br />previously had said from above. <br />3 ayes 2 nays Motion Failed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.