My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1992/03/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Minutes - 1992/03/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 3:19:55 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:08:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/9/1992
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ounds View City Council Page Three <br />~egular Meeting March 9, 1992 <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />Mayor Linke opened the public hearing to consider Wetland Alteration Permits <br />for Long Lake Road at 7:05 p.m. <br />Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that because of <br />the remodeling and mass confusion at City Hall, notices were inadvertently <br />not published. Minetor stated that according to the City's code, the <br />Council has the authority to issue wetland permits without a public hearing <br />if they so desire. <br />Minetor further stated that the Council had two options with regard to this <br />public hearing: 1) reschedule it for a date two weeks from tonight, or 2) <br />proceed with the hearing. Staff recommends rescheduling the hearing for two <br />weeks from tonight. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Blanchard to reschedule the public hearing <br />to consider Wetland Alteration Permits for Long Lake Road for <br />two weeks from tonight which would be March 23, 1992. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />ONSENT AGENDA <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, read the items on the proposed Consent <br />Agenda. <br />Councilmember Quick asked that Item 7, replacement of unmarked police <br />vehicle, be removed from the Consent Agenda for clarification by the Glerk- <br />Administrator. <br />MOTIONf SECOND: Rickaby/Wuori to adopt the Consent Agenda <br />minus Item 7 regarding replacement of <br />unmarked police vehicle. <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, was asked by Councilmember Quick to <br />clarify Item No. 7 taken from the Consent Agenda regarding replacement of <br />the unmarked police vehicle. Orduno explained that the reason this item was <br />removed was because a fund number had not been assigned to this expenditure. <br />The replacement vehicle should be coded to the Forefeiture Fund. <br />Councilmember Quick asked Orduno to explain where the funds in this account <br />come from. Orduno explained that these are funds raised from the sale of <br />items confiscated in raids or drug busts. Orduno further stated that this <br />fund is used mostly for police items such as bullet proof vests, squad <br />~erminals and radios. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.