My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1992/10/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Minutes - 1992/10/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 1:27:07 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:11:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Seven <br />~gular Meeting October 13, 1992 <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated that during the Council discussions regarding <br />the hiring of this position, it was stated that the City wasn't going to <br />need as much planning experience because the City's planning was nearly <br />completed and that is why the Gity was hiring a Planning Technician. <br />The City went to a lower level position and then that person gets put into a <br />higher level classification and receives higher pay which defeats the hiring <br />of a Planning Technician. Rickaby stated that she has no argument that he <br />does a wonderful job and she is not arguing against his reclassification. <br />Mayor Linke stated that Paul was hired and he grew into the reclassified <br />position and that tells the City that it did a good job of hiring and that <br />the City could watch him grow into a higher position. <br />Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the City <br />has to look at the past. In the past the City tried to go with a Planning <br />Technician and it hasn't worked. Paul has gone beyond what the position <br />called for. The City benefitted from a tight job marked. Paul cannot be <br />cut back to Planning Technician. The City's has benefitted from Paul's <br />experience. Paul has done the job and gone beyond Planning Technician. <br />Nearly every City has a Planning Technician and a City Planner. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Rickaby to Approve Position Classifications <br />VOTE: 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS: <br />A. Paul Harrington, City Planner, reviewed Staff Report No. 92-403 <br />regarding approving/denying the Sign Area Variance Request by <br />Paster Enterprises for the Property Located at 2577 Highway 10. <br />Harrington stated that Paster Enterprises, representing Budget <br />Liquor, has made application for a variance to allow for signage <br />in excess of City allowed size requirements at 2577 Highway 10 <br />(Mounds View Square). <br />The Mounds View Planning Commission at a special October 1, 1992 <br />meeting, reviewed and denied the request as proposed. The applicant <br />is now exercising his right of appeal of that decision to the <br />City Council as allowed by the Municipal Code. <br />Paul Harrington then introduced Jim Everson, representative <br />from Paster Enterprises, to go over the request. <br />Mayor Linke stated that the Mounds View code allows for up to 100 <br />square feet of sign area per business occupant in the form of a wall <br />sign. The applicant has proposed two signs each approximately 185 <br />square feet in area to be located on the south and west sides of the <br />building. The plans indicate that both signs will be illuminated. <br />John Streeter, Paster Enterprises stated that the Budget Liquor sign <br />would have 42" letters instead of 36" letters as in the past. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.