My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1992/10/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Minutes - 1992/10/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2025 1:27:07 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:11:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/13/1992
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Page Eleven <br />~gular Meeting - October 13, 1992 <br />fee would be very hard on senior citizens. If the property taxes <br />are increased there is a circuit breaker that aids residents in <br />getting some of the money back. White suggested the franchise <br />fee be eliminated from the franchise agreement. <br />Terry Wiley, 2279 Oakwood Drive, stated that contrary to the other <br />25 people in the room he thinks that the residents have to pay for <br />services received from the City. The City needs a certain number <br />of dollars to run the City. The funds have to come from somewhere. <br />Wiley suggested leaving all options open. If the City does not <br />leave all options open regarding the franchise fee and the City doesn't <br />have options they can't use them. <br />Charlie Hall, Mermaid Supper Club, stated that the residents of the <br />community are crying out for help with regards to not implementing <br />the franchise fee and he hopes the Council hears them. Mr. Hall <br />stated that the City Administrator is a nice person to work with, <br />the Mayor has met with him several times and is a tribute to the <br />City. Mr. Hall hopes that the Council listens to the business <br />community and the residents and does not implement the franchise <br />fee. <br />. Chuck Miller, 2408 Laport asked about levy limits. <br />Mayor Linke explained that the City has no control over property <br />taxes. The County has control on property valuation and the State <br />sets how much of the rates are charged against that. This amount <br />affects what the City levies. <br />Orduno explained why the City must look for alternative means <br />of revenue and not be dependent on local government aids. <br />Mr. Miller stated that the City must adjust spending. Miller <br />stated that persons at his company have not had a raise in three years. <br />Orduno gave another example of mandates on the City -- the 6.5~ <br />sales tax. This was not something budgeted for. <br />Linke stated that the City during the budget process looks into not <br />only property taxes but license fees and various other revenue sources <br />for the City. The franchise fee would be looked at during the budget <br />process just as the other revenues are. <br />Laurie Schley, Knollwood Drive stated that she objects to having <br />NSP collecting the franchise fee. Schley. stated that people should <br />pay for services. NSP treats her very well. Schley believes that <br />the City should not have a third party collecting funds for the <br />City's General Fund budget. Schley states that by having the <br />property tax increase it makes the residents of the City responsible <br />customers of the City budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.