My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 1992/01/01 (20)
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
Minutes - 1992/01/01 (20)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2025 1:28:44 PM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:11:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/1/1992
Description
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />\egular Meeting <br />Page Three <br />October 13, 1992 <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked what the duties of the maintenance receptionist <br />were because arguments were made at the Work Session for reclassification of <br />this position was that the duties were greater than those of the City Hall <br />receptionist. <br />Ric Minetor, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that the duties <br />of the maintenance receptionist were: phones, scheduling work for the <br />Public Works workers, schedule final readings, computer entry including <br />accounts payable, work accomplished reports, fuel usage and other various <br />reports, all secretarial work and correspondence including filing. <br />Samantha Orduno, City Administrator, reviewed the duties of City Hall <br />Receptionist as being: accepting and transferring of phone calls, <br />very minimal work with animal licensing, no typing or secretarial duties as <br />far as correspondence, and relaying information to staff members. <br />Minetor stated that the maintenance receptionist position is actually more <br />like a division secretary's position. <br />Orduno explained that there are criteria that have to be met in order to <br />reclassify a position. The positions, when compared, have to have similar <br />duties, tasks and responsibilities in order to be reclassified to <br />comparable positions. Inotherwords, if they walk like a duck, they should <br />e called a duck. <br />inetor explained that the present Public Works Foreman position is more <br />like a supervisor's position because he supervises many classes of people. <br />This position is responsible for supervising personnel in streets, water <br />department, sewer department, and the division secretary. This position <br />also works on a maintenance budget and sets maintenance project schedules. <br />The Public Works Foreman supervises the maintenance division and is given <br />main guidelines from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The Public <br />Works Foreman position is comparable to a Maintenance Supervisor in the <br />Stanton schedule. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked Minetor what positions he supervised. <br />Minetor responded: supervises personnel in the Planning Department, the <br />Building Inspector and the Building Department Secretary. <br />Councilmember Rickaby stated that maybe the <br />engineer. This was discussed some time ago <br />argument was that this position would be toy <br />many other people would have to be hired to <br />stated that if the Public Works Foreman was <br />perhaps the City should look at turning the <br />half time position and not having this type <br />supervisor is supervising a supervisor. <br />City didn't need a full time <br />and Rickaby stated that the <br />~ difficult to replace as too <br />replace this position. Rickaby <br />doing supervisory work now, that <br />City Engineer's position into a <br />of bureaucracy where a <br />chard Oman, 8205 Groveland Road, offered that when services expand <br />~ersonnel shouldn't be expanded to create a bureaucracy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.