Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Page Four <br />~egular Meeting October 26, 1992 <br />Harrington recommended that Mr. Engberg should be required <br />to meet the conditions that were put into the original Conditional <br />Use Permit. The wall should be installed in the garage and that <br />that portion of the garage should not be used for automobile <br />storage. Mr. Engberg has been issued an Administrative Offense <br />with regards to this item for violation of the Conditional Use <br />Permit. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked what happens if Mr. Engberg doesn't <br />conform . <br />Harrington responded that the Planning Commission and Council <br />would have to make a decision to rescind the Conditional Use <br />Permit or continue issuing Administrative Offenses. <br />Mayor Linke stated that, in his opinion, Mr. Engberg should <br />have 30 days to come into conformance and if he doesn't <br />issue him a regular citation. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked why go to a regular citation rather <br />than the Conditional Use Permit. <br />Mayor Linke explained that an Administrative Offense for violation <br />• of the Conditional Use Permit is dealt with strictly by the City <br />and the hearing officers who would decide it's fate are the Police <br />Chief or the City Administrator, whereas, the citation would bring <br />Mr. Engberg into Court in front of a judge. Linke stated that <br />Mr. Engberg has paid no attention to the Administrative Offense and his <br />recommendation would be to issue a court citation. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated that under these circumstances where <br />Mr. Engberg has had almost two years to come into conformance with <br />what he had agreed to do and the Planning Commission has worked with <br />him for two months and he has made no efforts to correct the situation <br />and an Administrative Offense will not make him do it that the Council <br />should rescind the Conditional Use Permit. <br />MOTION: Councilmember Blanchard to rescind the Conditional Use Permit <br />adopted in Resolution 4081. <br />Motion failed for lack of a second. <br />Councilmember Rickaby asked what happens if the Conditional Use <br />Permit were rescinded. Rickaby stated that staff worked with him <br />to get him to tear down the extra garage that he built without a <br />license and Mr. Engberg now should be given 30 days to come into <br />conformance with the Conditional Use Permit and if he does not <br />conform then the Conditional Use Permit could be rescinded. <br />Councilmember Blanchard stated that the Planning Commission has <br />been working with him for the past two months to get him to <br />