My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2011/09/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
Minutes - 2011/09/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:02:42 AM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:22:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/26/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 26,2011 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 • <br /> Stantec Consulting Services Inc., as both firms now had engineers that have experience with the <br /> project. <br /> Public Works Director DeBar reviewed the fee proposals described in the Staff report and <br /> recommended the Council authorize Stantec Consulting Services Inc. to perform engineering <br /> design services for Area, as their bid was lowest. <br /> Brian Amundsen, 3048 Wooddale Drive, commented that the Street and Utility Committee was <br /> not aware of the information presented by Staff this evening and had not reviewed Staff's <br /> recommendation. <br /> Mayor Flaherty asked Public Works Director DeBar if the Street and Utilities Committee <br /> reviewed the engineering fees in the past. <br /> Public Works Director DeBar indicated that the Committee has reviewed the overall Program <br /> costs that include the engineering fees, but the Committee has never reviewed engineering fees <br /> individually. <br /> Mayor Flaherty questioned why Stantec's figures were$258,000 less than the original estimation. <br /> Lee Mann, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. stated the original fee schedule was created by an <br /> individual that was no longer with the firm. For this reason, the new numbers were reviewed <br /> with Public Works Director DeBar and the new estimation streamlined several processes, • <br /> creating greater efficiencies,reducing the expense to the City. <br /> Public Works Director DeBar added that after completing several street improvement projects for <br /> the City, the City was seeing some efficiencies in the process, which was reducing the overall <br /> expense of the project. Public Works Director DeBar was not comfortable with Bonestroo's <br /> preliminary fee estimate and was confident that the fee estimate could be reduced. Public Works <br /> Director DeBar also credited the lower fee to City Staff talking on a larger portion of the <br /> workload through each improvement project, which reduced the time spend by the engineering <br /> consultant. <br /> Mayor Flaherty asked when the Street and Utilities Committee would be typically informed of <br /> the information presented by Staff this evening. Public Works Director DeBar indicated he <br /> spoke with the Council earlier this year about continuing to use Bonestroo for Area E or allowing <br /> other firms to submit fee proposals, at which time the Council directed Staff to proceed with <br /> using Bonestroo. However, with the unique situation of a merger, Staff felt this was an <br /> opportune time to review the situation and allow fee proposals to be solicited by two firms with <br /> staff having experience with the City's street projects. In the end, the solicitation was good for <br /> the residents, and taxpayers would win through the cost savings. <br /> Mayor Flaherty asked Public Works Direct() DeBar whether the engineering costs associated <br /> with last year's Area D project were brought to the Street Committee or their review. <br /> Public Works Director DeBar reported they were not. • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.