Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 24,2011 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 4 • <br /> Council Member Stigney felt the City was right in this matter and should have the case presented <br /> to a judge. <br /> Ayes—3 Nays— 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br /> B. Resolution 7843, Approving the Minor Subdivision of 7337 Spring Lake <br /> Road. <br /> Associate Planner Heller explained the Council was being asked to consider a minor subdivision <br /> at 7337 Spring Lake Road. The original owners lived at this address since 1948. Both have <br /> since passed and the children were preparing the home for sale. The home was situated on the <br /> property in such a manner to allow for a subdivision of the parcel into two lots. The south lot <br /> would be vacant and could have a new house built on the site. The size and setbacks of the lot <br /> meet City Code. <br /> Associate Planner Heller indicated park dedication fees were recommended for the square <br /> footage of the new lot. Staff sent notices to adjacent property owners prior to the Planning <br /> Commission and no comments were received. The Planning Commission unanimously <br /> recommended approval of the minor subdivision. <br /> Mayor Flaherty questioned if the Planning Commission recommended the 5% park dedication • <br /> fee. Associate Planner Heller stated the amount was included within the Staff report, but this <br /> amount was not determined by the Planning Commission. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7843, <br /> Approving the Minor Subdivision of 7337 Spring Lake Road. <br /> Ayes—4 Nays—0 Motion carried. <br /> C. Resolution 7841, Authorizing the Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at <br /> 2242 Bronson Drive. <br /> City Administrator Ericson indicated this Resolution would seek authorization to conduct an <br /> abatement at 2242 Bronson Drive. The neighboring property owner was present at the October <br /> work session meeting to discuss the concerns at 2242 Bronson Drive. The City's code <br /> enforcement officer has been to the property on a number of occasions and the property owner <br /> was working to correct the violations. <br /> City Administrator Ericsoni handed out a,;_ updated progress report on the property. He <br /> recommended the Council authorize the abatement to ensure that the remaining items are <br /> handled. If approved, the City would abate ti-; nuisance itc:us no sooner thro±five. calende:r days <br /> from today's do. 'fills would rC Jin e thn ro o c sevcral additional days in cori=t the <br /> violations before the City would take action. Those expenses would then be assessed to the <br /> property owner. • <br />