Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council December 12, 2011 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br />presented the Council with pictures taken by the Mound View Police Department. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty indicated the City had no recourse but to go after the property owner to ensure <br />that site would be cleaned. Ms. Morse stated the site was clean and the list received from the <br />City was reviewed. <br /> <br />Mike Morse explained a trespassing notice has been posted on the site to ensure no further items <br />were stored or left on the site. He questioned when he could sell the items left on site. City <br />Attorney Riggs indicated abandoned items left on the site could be removed or sold by the <br />property owner after proper notification has been made. He recommended a reputable company <br />be used for the abatement to ensure that items were held for the property timeline. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty recommended the property owners continue to work with City staff to ensure that <br />all items were taken care of. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Flaherty/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7864, <br />Authorizing the Abatement of Nuisance Code Violations at 8379 Red Oak Drive. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn indicated the Council was going through the formality of the process to <br />place the abatement on the record. She thanked the property owner for working with the City on <br />this issue. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 5 Nays – 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />E. Resolution 7865, Approving the Minor Subdivision of a Vacant Parcel <br />adjacent to 2565 & 2573 Sherwood Road. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller explained the Council was being requested to approve a minor <br />subdivision of a vacant parcel adjacent to 2565 and 2573 Sherwood Road. She reviewed the <br />location and noted Parcel A would be subdivided and sold to neighbor Joe Holl at 2573 <br />Sherwood Road. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Heller indicated the city is requiring that the parcels would have to be tax <br />combined in order to allow for an accessory structure to be built on the additional property. She <br />explained Parcel B was landlocked, while Parcel A has platted road frontage and could possibly <br />have access to unimproved Greenwood Drive, which made it a potentially buildable lot. If either <br />of the lots were developed in the future, park dedications fees would need to be paid to the City. <br />She stated the Planning Commission recommended approval. <br /> <br />Mayor Flaherty requested further information on how an accessory structure could be built. <br />Planning Associate Heller stated if the parcels were tax combined an accessory structure would <br />be allowed. If the parcels were separated, the lot would have one year to be developed, or the <br />accessory structure would have to be removed. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7865,