My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2012/03/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
Minutes - 2012/03/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 9:58:29 AM
Creation date
2/26/2025 3:38:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/12/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 12, 2012 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> several neighbors did not object to the garage itself, the feeling was the rules should have been <br /> followed. The Commission could not find the practical difficulty in this case and, therefore, <br /> denied the variance request. <br /> Planning Associate Heller stated at this time, the applicant was appealing the variance denial by <br /> the Planning Commission. Staff posted another public hearing for this case, and an email was <br /> received from the property owners at 2508 Sherwood stating they did not object to the garage. <br /> Mayor Flaherty also received a phone call stating a neighbor did not object to the garage. Staff <br /> understood that the garage was well built, but found no reason for the variance to be approved. <br /> She presented several photos of the garage at 8027 Woodlawn for the Council to review. <br /> Planning Associate Heller requested the Council hold a public hearing, allow the applicant to <br /> speak, and then take action on the Resolution. <br /> Mayor Flaherty opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. <br /> Christy Downing, 8027 Woodlawn Drive, reviewed a written statement with the Council. She <br /> requested the Council reconsider the variance request denied by the Planning Commission. Mrs. <br /> Downing believed the situation was a big misunderstanding and requested the Council keep their <br /> minds open while reviewing the information this evening. She stated the City has been <br /> concerned with the height of the garage. It was noted the garage was built according to plans, <br /> with the exception of a five inch difference in height and the added dormers. • <br /> Mrs. Downing stated the report from the City states the initial plan submitted showed a height of <br /> 11 feet at the midway point, this was inaccurate. The original plans had a height of 15 feet at the <br /> midway point. She reported the City changed their code regarding garage heights, since the <br /> original plans were approved. Their garage was being held to the new limit. A change to the <br /> trusses brought about the increase in garage height. <br /> Tim Downing, 8027 Woodlawn Drive, stated the garage was constructed between August of <br /> 2010 and March of 2011. He had received permission from the City to build a garage that had a <br /> 15 foot mid-way height which resulted in an overall height of 21 feet at the peak. This was <br /> changed to 151 feet at the mid-way point which resulted in an overall height of 221/2 feet. He <br /> understood he did not have permission to add dormers to the garage. <br /> Mr. Downing stated the staff report claims the garage that was built was different from the plans <br /> submitted in 2007. He explained the plans are almost the same, with the exception of the <br /> dormers. The original plans were for a single story garage with attic trusses, to allow for storage. <br /> The garage that was built was a single story garage with attic trusses with a dormer on each side <br /> of the roof. He clarified that the garage was not a two story. <br /> Mrs. Downing requested the Council to consider the negative impact the community would feel <br /> by denying the variance request. She understood the need for Zoning Codes within the City, <br /> however, there was some flexibility built into this system through the variance process. She felt <br /> her garage was not causing harm to her neighbors and was in line with the character of the • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.