My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/02/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/02/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:29:35 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:38:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
2/28/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council February 28, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 30 <br />City Attorney Long advised that under Section 6.03 of the Charter, the term "Deputy Clerk <br />• Administrator," is utilized in terms of the individual appointed to serve in the absence of the City <br />Administrator, therefore, the Council may wish to amend the motion to reflect this terminology. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would offer an Author's Amendment in this regard, and inquired if the <br />Seconder also agreed. <br />Council Member Marty agreed. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Quick stated he would reluctantly move to accept Chuck Whiting's resignation. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Coughlin. To Reluctantly Accept the Resignation of City <br />Administrator Chuck Whiting. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Coughlin. To Extend the Meeting to No Further than 10:30 P.M. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />• F. Review of Airport Legislation Status. <br />City Attorney Long stated this item was a brief review of the Airport Legislation status. He <br />indicated that when they originally started the Session, they were uncertain whether or not they <br />could achieve a compromise in one or both of the Chambers that might avoid a more extensive <br />and costly fight in the Senate and the House. He explained that at this time, through some good <br />work by Senator Novak, and some good fortune as well, the Bill has cleared the Senate <br />Committee, and is now scheduled to go to the Senate Floor. <br />City Attorney Long stated he had spoken with Representative Haake that date, and procedurally <br />speaking, the Bill is currently sitting in the Rules Committee of the House. He explained that if <br />there was a compromise between some of the key players, the Bill would go right to the House <br />Floor in essentially the same form as it had the previous year, with a couple of amendments. He <br />stated it currently appears that the compromise is taking place, therefore, Representative Haake <br />would like to put the Bill in final form. <br />City Attorney Long advised that the Bill would go to the House Environment Committee because <br />of the wetland issue that has come forward. He indicated the Bill should clear this committee, <br />and then go back to the Floor, however, in both instances there are some major Floor fights, in <br />that the Metropolitan Airport Commission lobbying with full frontal attack against the Bill on <br />both the House and Senate Floor. He stated they believe they have a good chance of succeeding <br />• because of the new items they have learned related to the wetland issues, however, there are also <br />some cost implications there that City Administrator Whiting may wish to address. <br />City Administrator Whiting stated the cost of the efforts to date has met what was budgeted for <br />the year, and additional costs would have to be determined and approved by the City Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.