My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/03/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/03/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:31:29 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:39:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/13/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />design" engineers, however, MNDot has not seen the design plans, and must sign off on the <br />project. She indicated Ramsey County has not seen the design, and she has contacted many <br />people who are not aware of how the project is proposed. She advised that a final hearing of the <br />matter has been scheduled in May, and at this point, operating under the assumption that this <br />project will proceed as proposed is a fallacy. <br />Mrs. Oberg stated she was aware that the Council voted as they had because they believed the <br />residents desired the light based upon the results of the survey, however, the survey was <br />somewhat misleading. She explained that for some reason, two opposing responses were not <br />included, one being hers, three individuals indicated they would never have answered yes to the <br />survey, and others responded in favor of the light were shocked at the consequences. She <br />indicated there was some doubt to be cast upon the survey, however, she recognized that the <br />Council had voted based upon what they believed the needs and desires of the neighborhood <br />were. She reiterated that they would simply request the Council consider the alternatives that <br />would benefit the residents of Pleasant View Drive, as well as the business of Spring Lake Park, <br />which are struggling. She stated many people need representation in this matter, and she was <br />very glad the Mounds View City Council Members were their representatives, because she did <br />not feel very welcome in Spring Lake Park. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he had driven along Pleasant View Drive, and could see the <br />issues that have been brought forward. He indicated there were a number of issues due to <br />previous decisions, which have placed Mounds View in a less than favorable light with MNDot. <br />He advised that the less attention they bring to themselves, the farther they will go with MNDot, <br />adding that if they were to bring something forward to MNDot at this time, rt would only serve to <br />lessen their credibility. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated it was his understanding that the Council gave direction to have <br />Spring Lake Park and Ramsey County look into all the issues that have been raised, and each of <br />those issues will have to be identified and addressed. He explained that this matter is still in <br />process, and hopefully there could be some cooperative effort, and possibly some adjustments in <br />the plan could accommodate the desires of both Spring Lake Park and Mounds View. He <br />inquired if this information would be provided to the Council, and Mrs. Oberg would be notified <br />when it comes forward. <br />City Administrator Whiting stated he assumed it would be. <br />Mallory Crum, 7820 Gloria Circle stated she attended the meeting facilitated by Representative <br />Haake pertaining to safety issues on Highway 10. She requested an update regarding the status <br />of these issues, in terms of the traffic lights, the pedestrian bridge and items of this nature. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney stated at the previous Council Work Session, several issues were <br />identified, and the Police Chief, and staff are working with Ramsey County, attempting to make <br />the lights safer, and improve the access on Highway 10. <br />h <br />Crty Administrator Whiting indicated that at the Work Session, they were informed that t e <br />traffic lights provide sufficient time to cross the road. He stated that from staff s perspective, <br />every department that has any correlation to Highway 10 would approach the issues based upon <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.