My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:30:30 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:39:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Thymes to seek their counsel. He stated he wished City Administrator Whiting well in his new <br />endeavors across the river. <br />No further reports were considered. <br />7. CONSENT AGENDA <br />A. Approve Just and Correct Claims. <br />B. Licenses for Approval. <br />C. Approval of Catering Contract. <br />D. Approval of the llt" Rider of the St. Paul Water Agreement. <br />Mayor Coughlin asked the Council if anyone would like to remove Items for discussion. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he had inquired that date regarding items listed in Item A, Just <br />and Correct Claims, however, he had not yet received the responses. He indicated he did not <br />object to approving this item, with acknowledgement that he does not have the answers at this <br />time, and assuming the answers are satisfactory. <br />Council Member Marty requested Item C be removed from the Consent Agenda for further <br />discussion. <br />.MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Approve the Consent Agenda for Items A, B, and D as <br />presented. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Marty stated Item C is the City's agreement with Elegant Thymes Catering. He <br />indicated Article 2, which states "Termination may be made by either party without penalty or <br />cause" does not specify a time frame, however, Article 5 refers to a 30-day time period, and prior <br />to this, there is reference to a 180-day time period. He inquired if 30 days would be sufficient <br />time to obtain a new vendor, if the catering company were to terminate their contract. <br />City Attorney Long stated Finance Director Kessel has been involved in the substantive <br />negotiations of the terms of this agreement, however, he believed the practical effect of this <br />agreement is that in order to terminate, the caterer must provide 180 days notice before the end of <br />the initial term. He stated Article 2 pertains to termination without penalty or cause, and Article <br />5 sets forth a two step process, which requires the City give a 30-day written notice of a failure to <br />meet conditions, and provides a 30-day time period in which to rectify this. He explained that <br />this actually translates into a 60-day time period, which could be extended if desired. He pointed <br />out that the last paragraph of Article 2 indicates that Elegant Thymes Catering may also terminate <br />the agreement by providing 60 days notice, therefore, the minimal amount of time the City would <br />have would be the 60 day notice period in those clauses, which would typically be acceptable. <br />He pointed out that they would not wish to lengthen the time period too extensively, as this might <br />result m being locked m to a problematic situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.