Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Apri124, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />Commission meets to discuss this issue, they might bring forward some language they would <br />• prefer, and he had concerns regarding whether or not this Council would deal with that in good <br />faith. <br />Mayor Coughlin advised that this item could not go into effect without the agreement of both <br />parties. <br />City Attorney Long stated this particular footnote does not require the formal vote of the Charter <br />Commission, and pursuant to the discussions with the Charter Commission regarding <br />amendments to the Charter, they preferred not to delete this provision. He advised that the <br />addition of a footnote had come forward as an alternative, and it was the consensus of the Charter <br />Commission to proceed in this manner. He stated there was no specific language at that time, <br />and legal staff was directed to work out language with the Charger Commission Attorney as a <br />courtesy. He reiterated that this item does not require the vote of the Charter Commission, <br />however, the Council could certainly lay the matter over until the Charter Commission has the <br />opportunity to review the language. <br />Julie Olsen, 2663 Lake Court Circle stated there was a discussion pertaining to the City <br />Attorney's recommendation of a possible footnote, which she believed was suggested by the <br />Mayor, and in their response, the Charter Commission indicated they felt that because of the <br />manner in which the Charter was written, and because the motion had already been passed at the <br />Council level, this would be sufficient. She explained that they had no problem or issue in this <br />regard, however, they certainly would have an issue if there was any reason to question the <br />wording of the footnote, however, they did not feel this was necessary. She stated if the Council <br />desired courtesy input from the Commission, that would be acceptable, and if the Council desired <br />to move forward, that would also be acceptable. <br />Ms. Olsen stated with regard to the three Charter amendments that were directed to the Council <br />earlier in the evening, she was pleased that they were approved, particularly in light of the <br />urgency to move forward in this regard, however, this action was supposed to be made by a vote <br />of all members of the Charter Commission, therefore, she would request the City Attorney <br />examine this to determine whether or not the amendments have actually been made. She stated <br />she did not believe these items could proceed as amendments to the Charter without the vote of <br />all of the Charter Commission members. <br />Mayor Coughlin advised that direction must come from the Chair and not from the Floor. He <br />requested City Attorney Long speak to this issue. <br />City Attorney Long stated these ordinances require the unanimous vote of the Council, however, <br />he was uncertain if there were any further requirements, therefore, he would research the matter, <br />and if there are further requirements, these items would be brought back before the Council <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />• Council Member uick in uired if there was another issue Cit Attorne Lon would be <br />Q q Y Y g <br />researching for the Council. <br />