Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 8, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would agree to have legal staff research this issue and conduct a <br />survey for discussion and informational purposes, if nothing else. <br />Council Member Marty stated he would like to see statistics in this regard. <br />Council Member Stigney stated this would be acceptable if the elected official was properly <br />representing the public, however, if not, and that individual was elected to a four or six-year <br />term, the City would be stuck with them until the electoral process could change that situation. <br />He stated he favored the terms of office as the currently are. <br />Council Member Quick pointed out that the City could recall an elected official. Council <br />Member Stigney stated a recall would only be warranted in a very drastic situation, however, if <br />someone simply did not care for the manner in which an individual was representing them for <br />four to six years, there would be very little they could do about it. <br />Mayor Coughlin commented he has not been particularly pleased with the President of the <br />United States during the past seven and a half years, and he has dealt with this. He explained <br />that this is simply the democratic process in action. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated there was partial consensus of the Council to direct legal staff to conduct <br />research in this regard. <br />City Attorney Long stated staff could provide some statistics for the Council, in terms of average <br />term lengths, and staff would also prepare some draft language that would accomplish four year <br />terms for Mayor and six-year terms for Council Members, so that if they desire to move forward <br />in this process, it could be included with the other changes that are being contemplated. <br />Council Member Marty suggested that rather than tying up legal staff time, the Council could <br />direct Assistant to the City Administrator Reed to contact the League of Minnesota Cities <br />regarding the statistics. <br />City Attorney Long agreed, adding that legal staff would prepare the draft language. <br />C. Highway 10 Study Process. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated on March 13"', the Council approved a general <br />work plan and allocated funds to have Springsted & Associates facilitate discussions regarding <br />the future of Highway 10. He indicated that as staff has worked with Sprinsted to put some <br />detail to the study process, and they have come to the conclusion that changes to the work plan <br />and process originally proposed may be necessary. He explained that the original work plan <br />focused almost entirely upon community discussions to identity issues and priorities, however, as <br />they have examined all of the previous studies, it has become apparent that there has been <br />considerable community input, and it appears that most, if not all of the issues have been <br />identified at this point, therefore, it might be more appropriate to build upon those studies and <br />• prepare a specific action plan that would focus upon those common elements, and allow them to <br />proceed to the next step of implementing improvements. He indicated a finance plan could also <br />be developed to assist the City in this regard. <br />