My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/05/22
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/05/22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:14:21 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 22, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br />Council Member Quick indicated he did not believe it was necessary for Mayor Coughlin to <br />• abstain, as he would be required to stand election, regardless of the outcome. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated he would request the Council's indulgence in allowing him to abstain. <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if a vote of abstention would be counted with the vote of the <br />majority. City Attorney Long stated this was correct. <br />Council Member Stigney advised that the majority vote would not necessarily be an affirmative <br />vote. City Attorney Long advised that if there were a direct conflict in Minnesota State Statutes <br />that would allow for a true abstention, the abstaining vote would not be counted, however, if <br />there were no such conflict, the abstention would count as an affirmative vote, for the purpose of <br />counting the vote. <br />Council Member Stigney stated it was his understanding that the abstaining vote would count <br />with the majority vote, as opposed to an affirmative vote. He explained that if the majority voted <br />in opposition to the measure, the abstention would count as an opposing vote. <br />City Attorney Long stated he did not believe this was correct. He stated the abstention would <br />count as an affirmative vote. Mayor Coughlin stated in his recollection this was correct, <br />however, he desired to bring this forward for clarification. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays -1 (Stigney) Abstain - 1 (Coughlin) Motion carried. <br />F. Consideration of Hiring Public Works Utility Position. <br />Interim Administrator Ulrich stated the Council has been provided a staff report prepared by <br />Assistant to the City Administrator Reed, which indicates that six applications were submitted <br />for the Public Works Maintenance position. He stated interviews were conducted by Public <br />Works Foreman, Tim Pittman, Parks Maintenance Supervisor, Steve Dazenski, and Assistant to <br />the City Administrator Reed, and all three identified the top candidate was identified as Pete <br />Szurek, and recommended his hiring at Level A, which is $11.05 per hour. He indicated the <br />position would commence at 85 percent of the maximum level for that position, with quarterly <br />adjustments based upon performance. <br />Interim Administrator Ulrich stated two other conditions of employment require that the <br />applicant pass a physical examination and drug screen, and obtain both a Water and Wastewater <br />certificate within two years of employment. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Thomason. To Approve Staffs Recommendation to Hire Pete <br />Szurek for the Public Works Utility Position, Based upon the Terms and Conditions listed in the <br />Staff Report. <br />• Council Member Marty inquired if this individual would be released from employment if he has <br />not obtained the Water and Wastewater certificates within this two-year period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.