My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/06/05
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/06/05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:15:02 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:42:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/5/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 5, 2000 <br />Special Meeting Page 6 <br />B. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 662, Proposing an <br />• Amendment to the Mounds View Charter by Amending Chapter 2, Section <br />2.03 of the Charter as to Council Composition and Election in the City. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Waive the Reading, Approve the Second Reading and <br />Adoption of Ordinance No. 662, Proposing an Amendment to the Mounds View Charter by <br />Amending Chapter 2, Section 2.03 of the Charter as to Council Composition and Election in the <br />City. <br />Council Member Stigney stated this ordinance proposes to change the Mayor's term from two to <br />four years. He advised that one of the checks and balances set forth in the Charter is that the <br />Mayor is elected to a two-year term, to provide that if he does not do a good job, he must answer <br />to the residents within atwo-year time-frame, rather than in four years. He stated a Mayor has <br />the potential to do significant damage in two years, let alone, in four, and therefore, he believed <br />they should continue to utilize atwo-year term of office, as set forth in the Charter. <br />Council Member Stigney stated if the Council desires to proceed with this proposal, it should be <br />submitted to the Charter Commission for review. He explained that as the item is proposed, it <br />would go to the Charter Commission for review, and the Charter Commission could make <br />recommendations, however, the Council was not required to listen to those recommendations, <br />but could send the matter to the ballot on a vote of three individuals. He stated this might be a <br />legally acceptable process, however, he believed it circumvents something, and therefore, he was <br />• opposed to the measure. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated the citizens have the opportunity at the ballot box to determine whether <br />they approve or disapprove, and he believes that is where such decisions lie. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he was also a citizen and would vote on the ballot, however, at <br />this time, he would be voting as a Council Member as to the direction the Council was taking. <br />He reiterated that he did not support this measure. <br />Council Member Marty advised that the Mayor has no special powers in the City or the Charter. <br />He explained that the Mayor's vote is just one vote out of five on the Council, and he was simply <br />another Council Member who presides over the meetings. He indicated the Mayor was required <br />to attend a significant number of additional meetings, however, he simply presides over the <br />meetings and has no special powers. <br />Mayor Coughlin noted there was an exception, in that the Mayor, through consultation with the <br />Governor, was authorized to declare a state of emergency. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated although it would probably not specifically pertain to him, he would <br />request to abstain from the vote on this matter, in that it pertains to the position he presently <br />holds. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.