My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/06/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/06/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:20:23 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:43:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/26/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 26, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />• Council Member Stigney asked why ,the City is carrying Y2K coverage for next year. Mr. <br />Clysdale explained it is a continuing on-going coverage since problems can still occur and <br />remains a concern during Year 2000. <br />Council Member Marty asked how long the City should keep that coverage. Mr. Clysdale <br />recommended two to three years, noting it is a policy specifically written for municipalities by <br />the League and he is relying on them as to how long it will be necessary since it is an unknown <br />factor. Mr. Clysdale commented on a Y2K claim he is currently working on for one of his <br />clients and his belief that it will be years before it is known how that will develop. He explained <br />that claim is dealing with the huge amount of money spent to deal with Y2K issues and it is <br />being litigated nationally. He noted there is no guarantee that claim will be paid but if paid by <br />the litigation of large firms, it will open the issue for municipalities and private corporations to <br />bring claims. Thus, it is an evolving process. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated a few of his friends are in large corporations and it is true there is some <br />exposure not only due to computer errors but also to other preparations. He explained that there <br />maybe areas of concerns that are not yet known related to Y2K. <br />Mr. Clysdale stated his firm will continue to analyze and review this issue. <br />City Attorney Long noted the municipality liability information and listing of three joint powers <br />agreements. He stated the City has a contract with the YMCA to do work at the Community <br />Center and asked if that relationship needs to be listed separately as the others are listed. <br />Mr. Clysdale stated the YMCA contract does not need to be listed since it is not a joint powers <br />agreement and an entirely different type of business contract. He stated the joint powers <br />agreements are renewed each year and these three are the only ones the insurance company <br />considers to be joint powers agreements so they are specifically covered. <br />City Attorney Long noted the deductible is indicated to be $10,000 and asked if there is a $5,000 <br />deductible for some claims and a $10,000 deductible for other types of claims. <br />Mr. Clysdale corrected that the City's deductible is $10,000. He stated he misspoke earlier and <br />stated it is $10,000 per loss and a $50,000 annual aggregate is the most the City can pay. <br />Council Member Marty asked if $50,000 is the most the City can pay or the most the insurance <br />company can pay. Mr. Clysdale stated that $50,000 is the most the City can pay for all <br />deductibles in one year. <br />Council Member Marty asked what the difference in premium would be between a $5,000 <br />deductible and a $10,000 deductible. Mr. Clysdale stated he did not obtain a quote on that but <br />could do so. He stated there are various options available and he can obtain an alternate <br />. consideration and provide that information to staff. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.