Minutes - 2000/04/28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council August 28, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 11 . Mr. Sontare stated his friend owns a tattoo business and has consulted with the State of Minnesota and City of Sioux Falls which is becoming more aggressive in their enforcement of health and criminal issues (piercing and tattooing of minors). He stated this is an important issue to consider and while the City cannot enforce the criminal impact, it should be looked at. He stated his friend has indicated a willingness to provide information to the Council and review the ordinance as it is written to determine if he finds any shortfall. He offered to give staff the information on how to contact Steven Butterfield, his friend. There was no other public input. Acting Mayor Stigney closed the Public Hearing at 8:21 p.m. Council Member Marty stated his support to direct staff to contact Anoka County and Mr. Butterfield to obtain more information prior to adoption so a later amendment is not needed. City Attorney Long suggested it be tabled to the next Council meeting to assure there is no gap between the moratorium and when the ordinance becomes effective. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Table the Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 663, an Ordinance Creating Language to Administer and Regulate Tattoo and Body Piercing Establishments within the City of Mounds View until September 11, 2000. • A es - 4 Na s - 0 Motion carried. Y Y Mayor Coughlin was not present for the vote. C. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 665, an Ordinance Rezoning Properties Associated with the Walgreens Development from B-3 and PF to PUD. This item was considered earlier in the meeting. D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 666, an Ordinance Vacating the Old Edgewood Drive Right of Way Included within the Proposed Walgreens PUD. Planning Associate Ericson explained that with the realignment of Edgewood Drive through City Hall property, the old alignment (which is legally-described in Exhibit 1 to the proposed ordinance) no longer serves a public purpose and can be vacated. Ordinance 666 is the document by which the vacation is approved. The City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance 666 at its meeting on August 14, 2000. Since this is not a needed right-of--way, staff recommends approval of the second reading and adoption of Ordinance 666. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomason. To Wave the Reading, Approve the Second Reading and Adopt Ordinance 666, an Ordinance Vacating the Old Edgewood Drive Right of Way Included within the Proposed Walgreens PUD.