My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/09/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/09/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:16:20 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:47:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 11, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated the Interim City Administrator has been actively involved in the <br />• decision making process and he sees no need to delay until the new hire is in place. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />Council Member Quick was not present for the vote. <br />8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />None. <br />9. RESIDENTS REQUESTS AND COMMENTS FROM THE FLOOR <br />Dan Lamb of 2305 Sherwood Road said on July 17, 2000 he and other residents affected by the <br />ponding issue attempted to attend a work session meeting where Rice Creek Watershed officials <br />discussed the ponding issue and gave a presentation to the Council but they had an incorrect time <br />and arrived as the meeting was ending. <br />Mr. Lamb noted some of the residents were talking with Rice Creek Watershed officials <br />regarding their willingness to discuss and provide information on the ponding issue and agreed <br />to schedule a meeting between the residents involved and Rice Creek Watershed officials. Mr. <br />Lamb noted Interim City Administrator Ulrich questioned the legalities of an unofficial meeting <br />• and no meeting was ever scheduled. Mr. Lamb inquired as to if an informal meeting would have <br />been illegal. <br />City Attorney Long indicated if official business is being conducted and a quorum of the body is <br />present, then proper notice of the meeting must be given. He indicated it was a slightly gray area <br />but in his opinion any meeting containing discussions that could potentially lead to decision <br />making at the Council level could be considered illegal and in violation of the open meeting law <br />and as such he would recommend that a private meeting not take place. <br />Mayor Coughlin noted work sessions always start at 6:00 p.m. <br />Mayor Coughlin explained the liaison appointed by the Council is willing and trying to set up a <br />time to replay the video of the meeting in its entirety for the residents. <br />Mr. Lamb explained the residents reached an agreement with Interim City Administrator and the <br />Rice Creek Watershed officials to hold a meeting and the residents would like that meeting <br />scheduled. He then noted there has been nothing but confusion and misinformation surrounding <br />the ponding issue and requested the matter be clarified. <br />Mayor Coughlin stated as soon as the City received information from Rice Creek, a plan would <br />be drafted and the residents would be able to ask questions and give input. Mayor Coughlin said <br />• that he is not "married" to the project and if the residents are opposed he would not be in favor of <br />moving forward with the project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.