My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/11/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/11/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:28:08 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:50:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />November 27, 2000 <br />Page 10 <br />step 4 one year after the start date. The appropriate step and cost of living <br />increases would occur annually thereafter. <br />2. Set the maximum annual salary for the position at $65,822. Start Mr. Ericson at <br />step 1 ($52,657.60), advance him to step 2 after a satisfactory six-month <br />performance evaluation, and step 3 one year after the start date. The appropriate <br />step and cost of living increases would occur annually thereafter. <br />3. Set the maximum annual salary for the position at $68,045.40. Start Mr. Ericson <br />at step 1 ($54,436.32), advance him to step 2 after a satisfactory six-month <br />performance evaluation, and step 3 one year after the probationary period ends. <br />The appropriate step and cost of living increases would occur annually thereafter. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he would like to go with the recommendation of Labor <br />Relations Associates, Inc. which is the first option presented by Ms. Reed. <br />Council Member Thomas inquired as to how Option 1 figured into the budget for next year. <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed indicated that the currently approved salary for the <br />Community Development Director is Option 3 setting the maximum annual salary at $68,045.40, <br />which is included in the budget for next year. So, all three of the options are in line with the <br />budget for next year. <br />Mayor Coughlin noted Community Development Director Encson will be filling the vacancy m <br />the Planner's office until that vacancy is filled. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that after the study conducted by Labor Relations Associates, <br />Inc., and research within the City it was determined that to put the salary for the Community <br />Development Director in line with the points would put that position at a lower salary than other <br />department heads due to manipulating of the points system that has previously occurred for other <br />positions. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To approve Option 3 as presented by Staff approving the <br />maximum annual salary of $68,045.40, as the salary for the Community Development Director <br />Position. <br />Council Member Marty inquired as to how the salaries for the positions could be so far out of <br />alignment since it has only been a few years since the City went through the Hay Study. It was <br />his understanding that the purpose of the Hay Study was to provide fairness and pay people for <br />what they were doing. <br />Assistant to the Administrator Reed indicated the Hay Study was done in 1997 and Community <br />Development Director Jopke was hired in 1998. It is her understanding his salary was raised to <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.