My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2000/12/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
Minutes - 2000/12/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 10:20:37 AM
Creation date
2/27/2025 10:53:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 11, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Council Member Stigney inquired as to whether there was a curb stop box on either side of the <br />street allowing the City to shut off water should there be a water service leak or someone is not <br />paying for their service. <br />Public Works Director Ulrich indicated there was a curb stop box on either side of the street to <br />allow the City to shut off water service if the need arose. <br />Council Member Stigney stated what the City is proposing is ongoing repair for any break in <br />service now or in the future whether or not somebody has already paid to repair their service. He <br />knows of no other City that does this in the area so Mounds View would be setting precedent by <br />approving this program. In his opinion it gets back to who is responsible for what. Residents <br />should not expect the City to provide a driveway, water and sewer lines to the street that is a <br />resident responsibility. Providing the ability to hook up to streets, sewer and water is a City <br />responsibility. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he believes the City is remiss as it did not survey residents <br />through the water bill to determine how many residents would be in support of paying for such a <br />program. <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated Council did not direct Staff to survey residents when water bills were <br />sent out. Staff was directed to inform residents of the proposed change through other forms such <br />as the billboard out front of City Hall. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the majority of Council did not want residents surveyed when <br />the water bills were sent out but he had expressed a desire for polling of residents to determine <br />interest level and inform of the proposed change. <br />Mayor Coughlin indicated Council and City Staff had done a responsible job of informing <br />residents of the proposed change as shown by resident turnout at the first public hearing and at <br />tonight's meeting. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the Council elected not to have residents surveyed as he <br />believes should have been done. Council Member Stigney inquired as to how much the City will <br />have to pay the contractors to be under contract with the City. <br />Public Works Director Ulrich explained that contractors had not yet been contacted so he had no <br />price at this point in time. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated the City is attempting to help residents pay high water service <br />repair bills through this program. He knows of one City who helps by paying the first $1,000.00 <br />of the repair. In his opinion there is a question as to whether or not the City should be paying for <br />repairs. The way to fund those repairs is also an issue for Council Member Stigney. If the City <br />took 1/10`" of the franchise fee and put it into this fund the City would not need to charge <br />residents for water service repair. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.