Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />Stigney questioned whether Rice Creek Watershed would be conducting an environmental <br />impact study. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated they have not performed one and could <br />still do so but stated that decision is left up to the discretion of the board. She then stated that all <br />of the elements that would be analyzed in an impact statement will be looked at as part of the <br />design process. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the City would receive an acre per acre wetland credit. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated wetland credits are based on how much <br />wetland is created and there is no discretion. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that the pond seemed quite large to him and questioned whether <br />something smaller could be done. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative explained that at 3.7 acres they would begin <br />losing the cost effectiveness for the project. <br />Council Member Quick asked what it would take to remove the pond once it is in place. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative indicated the pond is filled in with dirt. <br />Council Member Quick asked if the City wanted to fill in the pond to develop the property if it <br />was expensive to do so. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated if the District does grant wetland credits <br />to the City it would be virtually impossible to develop the property as there are restrictions and <br />covenants that go along with the granting of wetland credits. <br />Council Member Quick questioned if approving the pond would prevent future development in <br />that area. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated the. wetland area and upland buffer <br />would not be able to be developed. <br />Council Member Thomas stated she felt there were so many advantages and disadvantages that <br />this matter was hard to prioritize. She then stated she felt that a smaller pond may be worth <br />building but stated she did not feel she could support a large pond. <br />Mayor Sonterre stated it was his understanding the Resolution is in favor of the proposal based <br />on Council preference for size of the pond. He then explained there was a beneficial meeting <br />with MNDOT where it was discovered that there may have been an inappropriate decision made <br />• when it came to determining Mounds View was not eligible for the sound wall. He further stated <br />that a representative from MNDOT had indicated that if the City were to put in an earthen berm <br />