My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/04/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/04/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />Stigney questioned whether Rice Creek Watershed would be conducting an environmental <br />impact study. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated they have not performed one and could <br />still do so but stated that decision is left up to the discretion of the board. She then stated that all <br />of the elements that would be analyzed in an impact statement will be looked at as part of the <br />design process. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the City would receive an acre per acre wetland credit. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated wetland credits are based on how much <br />wetland is created and there is no discretion. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that the pond seemed quite large to him and questioned whether <br />something smaller could be done. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative explained that at 3.7 acres they would begin <br />losing the cost effectiveness for the project. <br />Council Member Quick asked what it would take to remove the pond once it is in place. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative indicated the pond is filled in with dirt. <br />Council Member Quick asked if the City wanted to fill in the pond to develop the property if it <br />was expensive to do so. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated if the District does grant wetland credits <br />to the City it would be virtually impossible to develop the property as there are restrictions and <br />covenants that go along with the granting of wetland credits. <br />Council Member Quick questioned if approving the pond would prevent future development in <br />that area. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated the. wetland area and upland buffer <br />would not be able to be developed. <br />Council Member Thomas stated she felt there were so many advantages and disadvantages that <br />this matter was hard to prioritize. She then stated she felt that a smaller pond may be worth <br />building but stated she did not feel she could support a large pond. <br />Mayor Sonterre stated it was his understanding the Resolution is in favor of the proposal based <br />on Council preference for size of the pond. He then explained there was a beneficial meeting <br />with MNDOT where it was discovered that there may have been an inappropriate decision made <br />• when it came to determining Mounds View was not eligible for the sound wall. He further stated <br />that a representative from MNDOT had indicated that if the City were to put in an earthen berm <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.