My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/04/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/04/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />Council Member Stigney stated he was concerned that not all of the courses within the eight-mile <br />radius responded to the survey by Springsted and that Springsted did not solicit the information <br />from them but instead used only the information returned to them. <br />The Springsted Representative indicated the disclaimer in the study was correct because <br />Springsted is not a marketing firm. He stated they have used some standard numbers that are <br />used within the industry and, if there is a consensus at the Council level to look at market <br />numbers, then Council should do that. He noted there is a comparison on costs to build and <br />operate golf courses on the market side and, although they have looked at it, they do not submit <br />this as an exhaustive study as it was never intended to be. He stated he would not speculate on <br />the Blaine course because it is targeting a totally different market share and, unless the City is <br />going into a different market share, then they would not consider it. He then explained that the <br />target market for Mounds View's course is substantially different and the difference is income <br />level, beginning golfer and the golfer that wants a quick nine-hole game. The Blaine course is <br />marketing itself as a regional course to the youth market to get them interested in golf. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he is concerned that Springsted knew about the course in Blaine <br />and did not include it in the study. He then stated he is concerned that Springsted did not attempt <br />to get information from those courses that did not return the survey. <br />The Springsted Representative stated he felt they had enough history and data and does not think <br />it would substantially change the information for the study so they did not feel it was necessary. <br />He then stated they have a list and have a very strong feel that the operating cost ranges listed are <br />accurate and they are comfortable with them or they would not have given them. <br />Council Member Marty asked Mr. Hammerschmidt what the target areas were for the golf <br />course. <br />Mr. Hammerschmidt stated he does not consider Blaine a risk and one reason is Blaine is <br />marketing themselves to the high school player which would take high school play away from <br />Mounds View's course and free it up for adult play. He stated Blaine has been working on the <br />funding for the course for four years and during that time they have allowed him to sit on the <br />advisory board and he has learned the course is to be a championship course with 18 holes where <br />youth will pay their age and adults will pay $40.00. He stated that since Mounds View is a <br />$15.00 course Blaine is nowhere near the same target market. He then explained the target <br />market for Mounds View is the beginning golfer, the inexperienced golfer and people who want a <br />short course. He further stated there is not much competition in the executive course market. He <br />also indicated the growth and interest in golf is increasing at lower priced courses and decreasing <br />at the $50.00 and higher courses. <br />Mayor Sonterre questioned whether the study by the National Golf Foundation specified <br />regionalized numbers that were different in this state than in other states and wondered if <br />Minnesota was losing or gaining at the same rate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.