My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/04/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/04/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 12:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/9/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />Director Ericson explained it is an issue of the wetland credits and not of actually directing the <br />water to that pond. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if residents wanted to improve streets with curb and gutter how it would <br />work with the new needs for a place to send the water. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed representative explained it is the standard policy of the district to <br />require ponding if streets are reconstructed. The representative then noted the pond would factor <br />positively into the equation but would not speculate as to whether it would mean absolutely no <br />ponding or a lesser amount. <br />Council Member Thomas asked what moving the pond to the north side of Highway 10 would do <br />to the effectiveness percentage. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative indicated it would be fairly significant because <br />the area to the west does not drain through the golf course. <br />Council Member Marty stated he had a number of comments from residents on the south side of <br />Highway 10 who indicated they would like to preserve their area as much as possible. He then <br />questioned whether a smaller pond in the proposed location in conjunction with some ponding on <br />the north side of Highway 10 would be workable for Rice Creek Watershed. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative stated they needed to make those decisions <br />independently due to the planning and budgeting cycle. The representative then noted that if <br />Council desired to stay with a smaller pond they will move forward this planning and budgeting <br />cycle and look at the possibility of doing something additional on the golf course during another <br />budget cycle. <br />Council Member Thomas stated she had gone to the proposed ponding area to view it. She then <br />asked residents in attendance to explain the difference in the current water level as compared to a <br />normal water level. <br />Mr. Lamb of 2305 Sherwood Road stated that normally after the ground is thawed there is about <br />one foot of water in JD1 and Junction 5 almost never has any water in it. <br />Mike Reed of 2208 Lois Drive stated he believes the water appears to be coming out of Highway <br />10 rather than Sherwood Road. He then stated he did not believe that 60% of the flow is coming <br />off of Sherwood Road. <br />The Rice Creek Watershed District representative indicated the feasibility study gives a proposal <br />fora 12, 9, 6, and 3 acre pond and gives decreases in flow rates of roughly 30 to 35%. He then <br />noted the two things to keep in mind with flow numbers are there are two branches. One branch <br />from the north and one branch from the west. He then explained the water flows a lot more <br />. slowly out of the north than from the west. He further explained they are concerned with the <br />erosion that takes place with the sudden large flows from heavy rains and snow melts. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.