Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 11, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />t <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Stigney. To Approve Consent Agenda Items B through F as <br />Presented. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 <br />Motion carved. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there were four items he had questions on. He then indicated <br />the first was the corporate presentations for $8,337.52. The second is PGA of America for <br />$306.00. The third is Springsted Incorporated for $13,309. He noted he did not think the City <br />was done with the Springsted review and noted he is concerned with paying them at this time. <br />The fourth item is Verizon Wireless for the golf course in the amount of $192.97. He noted he <br />was concerned for the time period the bill covers and asked City Administrator Miller to <br />determine whether it was for a one month period. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated that she had spoken to Council Member Stigney late in the <br />day and was able to answer a couple of his questions but did not have information on the four <br />items mentioned. She then noted that she would check into the matters and provide information <br />to Council. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve Consent Agenda Item A Without Check <br />Numbers 1OS794, 105828, 105837, and 105844. <br />Ayes - 5 <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />A. Presentation by Marie Malrick, Program Coordinator for the Housing <br />Resource Center. <br />• <br />Community Development Director Ericson introduced representatives from the Housing <br />Resource Center whom were in attendance to answer questions concerning the City's <br />participation with the Housing Resource Center. <br />Carolyn Olson gave a brief overview of the Housing Resource Center and its program and then <br />had Ms. Malrick, the Program Coordinator hand out reports and brochures for Council to review. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated she felt the plan was great. <br />Council Member Quick questioned why some rebates are approximately 10% and others were <br />not. <br />Ms. Olson indicated that the rebate was based on a sliding scale which is based on income. <br />Council Member Thomas asked what the typical turnaround was on a project and for having the <br />Construction Manger come out. <br />