Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council July 9, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />i MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Quick. To Approve the Comprehensive Land Use Map for <br />Finalization at the July 23 Meeting. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />B. Public Hearing to consider the First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance <br />683, an Ordinance Rezoning Property Located at 2525 County Road I from <br />R-1, Single Family Residential, to R-2, Single and Two Family Residential. <br />Mayor Sonterre opened the public hearing at 8:52 p.m. <br />Director of Community Development Ericson explained this request is from Ernie Gustafson <br />who owns 3 lots. There are 2 undeveloped lots north of his lot. Mr. Gustafson has put forward a <br />subdivision plan making his 3 lots into 4. Three of the 4 lots would be rezoned to R-2, and this <br />drawing is on Exhibit C, included in the packet. The Planning Commission held a public hearing <br />on this issue on June 4 and many residents appeared before the Commission, and most opposed <br />the proposal. Included in this packet are a couple of letters and one email. The Planning <br />Commission felt this would not be an appropriate change and wouldn't fit in with the existing <br />neighborhood. <br />• The Planning Commission approved a resolution that provided an alternative to rezoning. This is <br />shown on exhibit F in the packet. This resolution recommended that Lots 3 and 4 of Exhibit F <br />could be rezoned and be consistent with the housing that already exists. Mr. Gustafson is not m <br />favor of this. If he were to subdivide to 5 lots, he would accept one lot facing County Road I at <br />R-2. There is room for 5 lots, but the lot line would end up too close to Mr. Gustafson's house. <br />There would be no access allowed from County Road I. Any R-2 lot would have to take frontage <br />from County Road I. Staff has prepared a rezoning ordinance for the Council's consideration. <br />There several options of the Council's actions which are: to approve the first reading; approve <br />the first reading with different rezoning; table the issue; or deny. Director Ericson invited Mr. <br />Gustafson to contribute to the public hearing as well as residents. <br />Commissioner Quick noticed that Exhibit C does not show 5 lots. Director Ericson explained <br />that option was proposed after the fact. Before the 5 lots can be drawn, the Planning <br />Commission would have to approve a variance for the setback on the side of the lot facing Long <br />Lake Road. <br />Ernie Gustafson, 2525 County Road I, stated that when he appeared before the Planning <br />Commission last month, he had proposed a subdivision of 3 lots. There would be a large duplex <br />lot next to the duplexes that are already there to the east. While Mr. Gustafson did not agree with <br />the option shown on Exhibit C, he did agree with the option shown on Exhibit F. He added that <br />when the tornado hit his home in 1965, he rebuilt the house so it could function as a duplex. He <br />said he hoped the area would be zoned to allow the duplex. He further explained that there is <br />• 105 feet from the Long Lake Property line to his home. There needs to be a 10 foot side yard and <br />he suggested taking 10 feet from his house. That leaves 95 feet by 135 feet on the corner of <br />