My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/07/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/07/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:13:40 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:13:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/23/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 23, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 11 <br />J. Consideration of Resolution No. 5595, Approving a Public Hearing for <br />Mounds View Drive Resurfacing Project <br />Public Works Director Michael Ulrich stated mailings would be sent to all affected property <br />owners in the resurfacing project of Mounds View Drive. A public hearing will be set August 27 <br />and this item will go to the City Council the second week in November. <br />Director Ulrich stated that paving cannot be done past the first part of November and therefore, it <br />maybe beneficial to extend the guidelines and not pave until the first part of Spring. However, <br />one consideration to paving in the spring is the freeze and thaw cycle and how that affects the <br />roads. Also, the cost could rise two to three times higher in the spring. <br />City Attorney Riggs pointed out there is a 60-day waiting period after the public hearing, and this <br />could hold the action up. <br />Director Ulrich stated that all property owners on the east would be assessed. He suggested it <br />maybe possible to have the property owners provide some type of document that they agree to <br />pay the assessments and work could begin sooner. He suggested the Charter Commission <br />consider this request. The 60-day waiting period is a long period and possibly 30-45 days could <br />be more appropriate. This timeframe would help in cases such as this one, and in larger cases. <br />Council Member Marty reiterated that if the paving isn't completed until next year, the cost will <br />rise. He suggested that if the City is approached by parties that will be assessed, if the City gives <br />them the facts, possibly the residents would work with the City to get the project started sooner. <br />Director Ulrich pointed out that there is a 60-day waiting period for anyone in the city; not just <br />those being assessed. Council Member Marty reiterated the possibility of asking the Charter <br />Commission to review this. <br />Council Member Quick stated it is not the Charter Commission's decision. The Council has the <br />responsibility to interpret the Code and suffer the consequences of its interpretation. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the Resolution should be corrected from County Road HZ to <br />Mounds View Drive. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Approve Resolution 5595 as amended, A Resolution to <br />Set the Date for a Public Hearing as August 27, 2001. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Assistant to City Administrator Reed stated she needed to present two items that maybe more <br />appropriate listed under Council Business. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.