My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/08/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/08/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:21:36 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:21:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 13, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />City pays, and incorporates member national and sectional dues. He asked why the City would <br />be paying the PGA's national dues. This particular payment was for Ronald Houston. <br />City Administrator Miller responded she was uncertain to what the policy is. She said she had <br />asked the Finance Department how many of the memberships the City usually pays and the <br />answer was that the City paid the Pros' membership dues. <br />Mayor Sonterre requested City Administrator Miller to look into the situation and see if a policy <br />is in place. <br />Council Member Stigney questioned check number 105837 in the amount of $13,309.87 to <br />Springsted, Inc. He stated he felt his questions were not answered within the study they <br />produced for the City Council. He said that Springsted, Inc. did not perform a market area <br />analysis and used 1997 data for their analogies. Council Member Stigney stated Springsted, Inc. <br />surveyed only 11 cities and made no attempt to contact the other 30. He said he spoke with Bob <br />Thistle at the League of Minnesota Cities Conference. Mr. Thistle indicated he thought <br />Springsted should look at more options with the Golf Course to see if it could break even. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that in the section regarding the 9 holes, there is no <br />indication that anything could be done. He summarized he questions paying this amount. <br />Council Member Marty stated he felt Springsted did complete the work and they answered all the <br />original questions. What they initially provided in first presentation to the Council was what the <br />Council initially asked of them. Then further questions arose and Springsted needed to work <br />more to find the answers. <br />Mayor Sonterre pointed out that the Council had asked Springsted back twice to answer <br />questions more fully, and by doing so the expenditure increase was technically approved. He <br />agreed with Council Member Stigney that Springsted could have pre-informed the City that if <br />they came back to the Council, they would bill additionally. <br />Council Member Stigney explained that he had been seeking clarification on the check to <br />Corporate Presentations, Inc., check number 105794 in the amount of $8337.52. The payment <br />was for cable equipment. The invoice shows that microphones were on backorder. As Council <br />Member Stigney made phone calls regarding this issue, he found that Alpha didn't seem to know <br />they provided a quote. However, Alpha offered to give a quote and that quote was close to <br />$1,000 less than Corporate Presentation's quote. Council Member Stigney questioned why the <br />contract was awarded to Corporate Presentation when they had the higher quote. <br />City Administrator Miller responded this was an expenditure authorized by the previous <br />administration. <br />Council Member Stigney questioned whether this purchase was approved by the Council. City <br />Administrator Miller stated it should have come to the Council; the equipment is on hand. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.