Minutes - 2001/08/27 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council August 27, 2001 Regular Meeting Page 5 MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Stigney. To move all of the above issues to the next work session and direct staff to prepare policies for all of these issues. Ayes - 4 (Sonterre, Quick, Stigney, Marty) Motion carried. MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Sonterre. To Approve Item 6A, Just and Correct Claims. Council Member Stigney requested a friendly amendment to remove Check number 106412, (the Ulrich party) from the approval. Council Member Quick declined the friendly amendment. Ayes - 2 (Sonterre, Quick) Nays - 2 (Stigney/Marty) Motion failed. With respect to check number 106471, Council Member Marty asked if this expense was for Xcel energy for the past winter. City Administrator Miller replied she would check and get back to Council. Council Member Quick stated this was the typical way things had been done, and the best way to handle this was to have a formal policy for these issues. With respect to the going away party, this was typical, every employee who had left had going away parties, and the City had provided some of the support for the food. Council Member Quick stated this was nothing new. He stated . they could discuss what they were going to do in the future and go from there. Council Member Stigney stated it was the amount that was bothering him, and he would not agree to pay for this at this time. He stated he would not vote for it. MOTION/SECOND: Marty. To Approve item 6A, but to refer the topic of discussion for going away parties, for the Maintenance Department to develop a list of auto repair businesses and to take the lowest bidder, and to look into travel expenses to a future work session. Council Member Marty retracted his motion. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To reconsider Council Member Quick's second motion to pay the bills. Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Reconsidered motion carried. With respect to Items 6G, H, and I, Council Member Marty stated on Item 6G he wanted a copy of the performance evaluation. He also asked for the same thing on Item 6H. He stated with 15 percent pay increase as acting Chief, that person would be making more than the Chief was making and suggested the 15 percent increase be addressed. With respect to Item 6I, he stated he did not see a problem with any of these, but wanted to see the performance review. Council Member Quick inquired if that information was confidential.