My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/12/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/12/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:28:40 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:26:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 10, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />Acting Mayor Stigney expressed concern with including an increase at six months becaused this <br />employee is starting higher up on the pay scale. He then noted he felt the practices have been to <br />wait one year for an increase when starting higher m the pay scale. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney commented that he feels the City could contract out this position and base <br />the pay on a percentage of the building permits rather than hiring a full time employee and paying <br />benefits for that employee. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 1(Stigney) Motion carried. <br />Council Member Marty asked that Resolution 5676 be read. <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated this Resolution had come before Council becaused <br />staff had received comments from employees indicating it would be nice to treat the New Year's <br />holiday the same as Christmas Eve. <br />Council Member Marty read the part of the Resolution that requires that employees must use flex <br />time, vacation time, compensatory time or unpaid leave for four (4) hours. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas. To Approve Consent Agenda Item 7N as Presented. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />8. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. Public Hearing and Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission <br />Denial of a Variance Requested by Harstad Companies Regarding the <br />Proposed Longview Estates Major Subdivision, Planning Case VROl-010. <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that Mr. Harstad was before Council to <br />request an appeal of the Planning Commission denial of his request to vary from the minimum <br />lot width requirements of Chapter 1010 governing the wetlands. He then noted that he had <br />noticed residents within 350 feet and others known to be interested in the project. <br />Director Ericson indicated that in order to be granted a variance there is a set of criteria that must <br />be met. He then indicated that, in this situation, the Planning Commission felt there was no <br />hardship and no justification to warrant approving the variance. He further indicated that, in his <br />staff report, he had included Staff's interpretation of the criteria and how those could be met. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff had provided two Resolutions for consideration, one <br />upholding the Planning Commission denial and another overturning the Planning Commission's <br />decision and granting the variance. <br />Director Ericson indicated that letters expressing opposition to the requested variance received <br />from residents were placed in Council boxes earlier today. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.