My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2001/12/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - 2001/12/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2025 2:28:40 PM
Creation date
2/27/2025 2:26:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/10/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 10, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />Michelle Sandbeck of 2356 Sherwood Road indicated that she did not live in this area but said <br />about a year ago Rice Creek Watershed was talking about putting in a wetland by her house and <br />has now approved taking this wetland. She then asked if this was some type of exchange and <br />whether or not an environmental impact study was done for this. <br />Director Ericson indicated he did not believe an environmental impact study was applicable. <br />Michelle Sandbeck indicated that, if residents are concerned, Rice Creek Watershed District <br />should determine whether there is a need for an environmental impact study based on the <br />worksheet. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that Rice Creek Watershed District, as part of its application <br />process, reviews whether or not an environmental impact study is required. <br />Acting Mayor Stigney asked Staff to verify that Rice Creek had looked into the necessity of an <br />environmental impact study. <br />Council Member Marty indicated that an environmental impact study could be requested. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that, if the City requests the study, the City has to pay for it. <br />William Werner of 2765 Sherwood Road indicated that he has watched this type of thing going <br />on in the City for 40 or 50 years. He then indicated that when the City deviates from the wetland <br />plan it always creates other problems. He further commented that Rice Creek Watershed is not <br />concerned with water problems of the City and asked Council to remember that they represent <br />the overall view of all the residents and this could have an impact on a larger area because storm <br />sewers maybe needed to handle the water runoff. <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that storm sewers is a good issue to raise because he feels his property is <br />wetter than it would be if the City had storm sewer in the area rather than allowing runoff to <br />collect on his property. <br />Mr. Harstad indicated that his father had developed and built a lot of homes in the area and he <br />feels that the lack of storm sewer has had a huge adverse affect on this piece of property. He then <br />indicated that because of the lack of storm sewer in this area he would need to maintain ditches <br />in the front yards and would maintain trees in the front yards as part of the development. He <br />further noted that he disagreed with the comments that there are not many trees along Silver Lake <br />Road because based on the aerial photographs there are a considerable number of trees. <br />Mr. Harstad indicated he could not guarantee a 40 foot wide swath of trees would be saved but <br />expressed a willingness to work with Staff to determine what trees could be saved as part of the <br />grading plan. <br />Mr. Harstad indicated he could not speak to the water problems of the houses in the area but <br />commented that some of the houses were built prior to the requirement to have drain tiling. He <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.