My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/01/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/01/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:26:21 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:48:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />the cookie jar. He then commented he did not think it was necessary to have the City ask for <br />repayment by Resolution. <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated he had asked that the City request repayment by Resolution to <br />provide a way to track the matter. <br />Council Member Stigney clarified that the equipment ordered is what was received but the City <br />paid for other than what was ordered. He then commented that there has been a lot of time, <br />aggravation and money spent on this matter causing a big black mark on the City and he feels it <br />is time to move on. <br />Mayor Sonterre stated he disagrees with everything Council Member Stigney said and indicated <br />he had a dated copy of a fax order that indicates the equipment ordered which was what was <br />requested. He then commented that he never stocked or sold the equipment and had simply <br />made the opportunity available to the City by providing a catalog. He further commented that <br />the catalog did have 800 numbers available to contact for further information on the equipment <br />and said, if Staff did not investigate, other than looking in the catalog, that is where the fault lies. <br />Council Member Stigney commented the invoice that Mayor Sonterre had given the City <br />reflected entirely different equipment than was received at the Community Center. <br />Mayor Sonterre said he disagreed. <br />Council Member Marty indicated the Mayor had also stated that he did not sell the equipment <br />and knew nothing about the equipment but on the tape of the Park and Recreation meeting from <br />February of that year Terry Blatenbauer was talking about the equipment and she stated that she <br />had been into the store and the Mayor did have one of the pieces of the equipment in the store. <br />He stated the broad statements that the Mayor keeps passing out do not seem to add up. He then <br />indicated that the equipment was all for in home use and asked for a report on the usage and how <br />the equipment is holding up. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated she did not have that report with her this evening but noted <br />she would talk with the Public Works Director and get it to the City Council as soon as possible. <br />She also noted that, according to that documentation, it appears that the equipment is in good <br />shape and she will put information in the packet for the work session or the informational packet. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he had looked at the log book and the equipment is used about <br />four (4) hours a day and it is designed for thirty (30) minutes to one (1) hour per day. He also <br />noted he had been told the equipment had broken down and been repaired. He then stated he <br />does not know why the Mayor keeps double talking and said that, if somebody had stepped up to <br />the plate and accepted responsibility, this would not have cost the City so much in attorney's <br />• fees. He further stated he does not understand why this matter had to be drug out to the 12`" hour <br />and finished by Resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.