My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/01/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/01/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:26:21 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:48:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br />• <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed explained this item was before Council at the December 3, <br />2001 work session and Staff was asked to amend the Ordinance to allow other Mounds View <br />Organizations to conduct charitable gambling in the City and create a 10% fund. She then <br />explained that several issues had been raised by the Lions and she had attempted to answer those <br />questions. <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed explained that the organizations are required to fill out a form <br />to send to the state listing profits from each site. She then explained that the City is not able to <br />restrict organizations to spending the majority of profits in the City. <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed explained the 3% in the Roseville ordinance is used for <br />regulating the organizations. <br />Bob Wharton of 7462 Spring Lake Road explained that the reporting mentioned by Staff is for <br />gross income minus prizes and expenses to establish net income from that site. He then <br />explained that after that is where the big bucks come into play. He further commented that <br />combined profit is not shown for the entire organization on that form it is only income from that <br />site after expenses. <br />Mr. Wharton indicated the Lions were not opposed to the 75% as they already meet that <br />• requirement but would prefer that the 10% and 3% be eliminated. He also commented that he <br />agreed with Council Member Thomas' comment when she asked why the City would want to get <br />into administrating this. He then asked Acting Chief Brennan if there have been any instances <br />where law enforcement has been necessary to administrate the gambling or investigate the <br />operations. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated that the Police Department conducts background investigations <br />as part of the licensing requirements but stated he was not aware of any investigations necessary. <br />Mayor Sonterre explained the 3% tax can only be collected if it is necessary to cover the costs to <br />regulate costs. He then asked what the process would be to return the overage if it is not used for <br />regulating the organizations. <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed suggested exploring whether or not Council could designate <br />the overage to be used for a specific purpose within the City, such as the Community Center. <br />Gretchen Wallbridge of 8072 Long Lake Road addressed Council and indicated she would <br />become the gambling manager on February 1, 2002 and explained that the 3% needs to be used <br />for law enforcement. <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed indicated that changing the ordinance may open the market up <br />to other organizations and there may be a higher demand for investigating applications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.