Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br />Council Member Marty raised what he feels is another issue concerning the Police Civil Service <br />and that is the fact that Council Member Quick's spouse services on the Commission. He <br />commented that he sees this as a possible conflict of interest that may also pose an ethical <br />question. He then asked the City Attorney to look into whether it is appropriate to have spouses <br />of Council Members serving on Commissions and Committees within the City. <br />Mayor Sonterre noted that the term of the person being discussed was not presently up and <br />suggested that the City Attorney review the matter and provide a report. He then indicated that <br />he had reviewed information from the League of Minnesota Cities and had not seen anything that <br />would prevent the spouse of a Council Member from serving on Commissions or Committees <br />within the City. <br />Council Member Marty commented that due to what came up he was not sure if it was a <br />personality conflict or what it was. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked that since the matter was not part of the agenda the matter be set for <br />discussion at the work session in February. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Marty. To Table This Matter for Further Information. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />• 9. REPORTS <br />Assistant City Administrator Reed reported that Mr. Hess had asked her to ask Council whether <br />Members wished to continue receiving packets via a-mail. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated she would like to receive the packet via e-mail. <br />Council. Member Stigney indicated he did not need the original packet by a-mail but asked that <br />any changes be sent by e-mail. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated he would like to receive the packet via e-mail. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he would like to continue getting the hard copy and would let <br />Staff know if he wants to receive the packet via e-mail. <br />Acting Chief Brennan reviewed his Staff report with Council and pointed out that the Police <br />Department had saved the budgeted $14,000 plus the $4,000 carried over from the previous year <br />that was to be used to remodel the front counter area to make it updated and EDA compliant by <br />determining that no EDA changes were necessary and asking the Public Works Staff to install a <br />new counter. He also pointed out that the Police Department had budgeted $15,000 for two <br />separate security proposals for the Police Department and he had determined that the current lock <br />and key system is working just fine and not expended the funds. <br />